[U-Boot] [PATCH 16/22] x86: board_f: Adjust x86 boot order for performance
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Wed Dec 31 06:51:08 CET 2014
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> For bare platforms we turn off ROM-caching before calling board_init_f_r()
> It is then very slow to copy U-Boot from ROM to RAM. So adjust the order so
> that the copying happens before we turn off ROM-caching.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
> common/board_f.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
> index 98c9c72..1b65575 100644
> --- a/common/board_f.c
> +++ b/common/board_f.c
> @@ -983,6 +983,11 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
> INIT_FUNC_WATCHDOG_RESET
> reloc_fdt,
> setup_reloc,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> + copy_uboot_to_ram,
> + clear_bss,
> + do_elf_reloc_fixups,
> +#endif
> #if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_SANDBOX)
> jump_to_copy,
> #endif
> @@ -1042,9 +1047,6 @@ void board_init_f(ulong boot_flags)
> */
> static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f_r[] = {
> init_cache_f_r,
> - copy_uboot_to_ram,
> - clear_bss,
> - do_elf_reloc_fixups,
>
> NULL,
> };
> --
I don't understand. Isn't the init_cache_f_r() which turns on the cache?
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list