[U-Boot] [PATCH] docs: driver-model: Fix spelling

[Chris Packham]

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham at gmail.com>
---
On 07/06/14 08:48, Simon Glass wrote:> Hi Chris,
> 
> On 5 June 2014 21:24, Chris Packham <judge.packham at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> (Joe, Simon, I'm not sure if this counts as "networking" or "driver
>> model" but figured it was close enough to warrant an Cc).
>>
>> We're looking at a new board design and are planning on using a
>> BCM5718 to provide a couple of Ethernet ports. The chipset is
>> supported in Linux using the tg3.c driver. I was planning on creating
>> an equivalent driver in u-boot using e1000.c as a guide and probably
>> borrowing heavily from the Linux driver.
>>
>> Is anyone else actively looking at Broadcom based chipset/NICs? Any
>> tips as for where to start or pitfalls to expect?
> 
> I'm not aware of anything myself, but it sounds like a good idea. If
> you feel able to convert 'eth' over to driver model that would be
> great too. There are only a small number of operations.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon

Yeah it doesn't look as thought it'd be too hard to do 'eth' (or is it
'netdev'?). I think I'll concentrate on doing the BCM5718 driver the current
way first then have a think about converting 'eth'.

In the meantime I spotted a few typos when reading the driver-model docs.

 doc/driver-model/README.txt | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/driver-model/README.txt b/doc/driver-model/README.txt
index dcecb9a..a5035be 100644
--- a/doc/driver-model/README.txt
+++ b/doc/driver-model/README.txt
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Terminology
 -----------
 
 Uclass - a group of devices which operate in the same way. A uclass provides
-	a way of accessing invidual devices within the group, but always
+	a way of accessing individual devices within the group, but always
 	using the same interface. For example a GPIO uclass provides
 	operations for get/set value. An I2C uclass may have 10 I2C ports,
 	4 with one driver, and 6 with another.
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ What is going on?
 -----------------
 
 Let's start at the top. The demo command is in common/cmd_demo.c. It does
-the usual command procesing and then:
+the usual command processing and then:
 
 	struct udevice *demo_dev;
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ The data can be interpreted by the drivers however they like - it is
 basically a communication scheme between the board-specific code and
 the generic drivers, which are intended to work on any board.
 
-Drivers can acceess their data via dev->info->platdata. Here is
+Drivers can access their data via dev->info->platdata. Here is
 the declaration for the platform data, which would normally appear
 in the board file.
 
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ method reads the information out of the device tree and puts it in
 dev->platdata. Then the probe method is called to set up the device.
 
 Note that both methods are optional. If you provide an ofdata_to_platdata
-method then it wlil be called first (after bind). If you provide a probe
+method then it will be called first (after bind). If you provide a probe
 method it will be called next.
 
 If you don't want to have the platdata automatically allocated then you
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ Changes since v1
 For the record, this implementation uses a very similar approach to the
 original patches, but makes at least the following changes:
 
-- Tried to agressively remove boilerplate, so that for most drivers there
+- Tried to aggressively remove boilerplate, so that for most drivers there
 is little or no 'driver model' code to write.
 - Moved some data from code into data structure - e.g. store a pointer to
 the driver operations structure in the driver, rather than passing it
-- 
2.0.0.153.g79dcccc