[U-Boot] [PATCH] patman: Only apply patches when we know the original HEAD
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Jun 23 05:39:26 CEST 2014
Hi Masahiro,
On 22 June 2014 21:19, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:27:06 -0600
> Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 11 June 2014 23:27, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > When patman applies the patches it checks out a new branch, uses 'git am'
>> > to apply the patches one by one, and then tries to go back to the old
>> > branch. If you try this when the branch is 'undefined', this doesn't work
>> > as patman cannot restore the correct branch after applying the patches.
>> > It seems that 'undefined' is created by git and is persistent after it is
>> > created, so that you can end up on quite an old branch.
>> >
>> > Add a check for the 'undefined' branch to avoid this.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>> Can you please check if this fixes the problem you reported? If so I
>> would like to get it into this release.
>
>
> I cannot understand why patman needs to apply the patches with 'git am'.
>
> Why isn't patman like this ?
> [1] Generate patches with 'git format-patch'
> [2] Parse the patman-tags in the generated patches and edit them.
2a. Apply the patches to make sure there are no whitespace errors.
> [3] Send the patches with 'git send-email'
>
The whitespace problems are not common but they do happen sometimes -
or at least I have seen it at times. Unless perhaps checkpatch has got
smarter?
>
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list