[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] nand/denali: Adding Denali NAND driver support
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Mar 6 00:04:05 CET 2014
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 17:01 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 12:23 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 11:34 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 18:03 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 14:51 -0600, Chin Liang See wrote:
> > > > > Why PASS/FAIL rather than normal "0 on success, negative error code on
> > > > error"? Why uint16_t?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Fixed by returning 0 when pass. Also changed uint16_t to uint32_t
> >
> > Why uint32_t and not int? Is that return value somewhere used in a
> > context that expects a NAND hardware status?
> >
>
>
> Nope, the return value is not used to compare against > 0 or < 0
Why not?
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list