[U-Boot] [PATCH] dfu: mmc: Replace calls to u-boot commands with native mmc API

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Pantelis,

> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pantelis,
> > 
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Feb 27, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi Pantelis,
> >>> 
> >>>> Hi Lukasz,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Looks fine to me. Let me run a few tests over the weekend and
> >>>> I'll apply.
> >>> 
> >>> Have the run test gone smoothly?
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> In the middle of reworking some core stuff in mmc, will test when
> >> that's done.
> > 
> > Does your rework intend to change the MMC API?
> > 
> > I'm regarding this patch as one suitable for v2014.04, since it
> > replaces cumbersome sprintf() approach with the native mmc API.
> > 
> > Those operations are done at dfu_mmc.c, not any core mmc file.
> > 
> 
> Your point is valid; I'll try to give it a spin today.

Ping.

> 
> >> 
> >> Regards
> >> 
> >> -- Pantelis
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> 
> >>>> -- Pantelis
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Feb 21, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> For some time we have been using the run_command() with properly
> >>>>> crafted string. Such approach turned to be unreliable and error
> >>>>> prone.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Switch to "native" mmc subsystem API would allow better type
> >>>>> checking and shall improve speed.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Also, it seems that this API is changing less often than u-boot
> >>>>> commands. The approach similar to env operations on the eMMC has
> >>>>> been reused.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski at samsung.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c b/drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c
> >>>>> index 0816f46..651cfff 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c
> >>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >>>>> #include <errno.h>
> >>>>> #include <div64.h>
> >>>>> #include <dfu.h>
> >>>>> +#include <mmc.h>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> static unsigned char __aligned(CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE)
> >>>>> 				dfu_file_buf[CONFIG_SYS_DFU_MAX_FILE_SIZE];
> >>>>> @@ -20,8 +21,8 @@ static long dfu_file_buf_len;
> >>>>> static int mmc_block_op(enum dfu_op op, struct dfu_entity *dfu,
> >>>>> 			u64 offset, void *buf, long *len)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> -	char cmd_buf[DFU_CMD_BUF_SIZE];
> >>>>> -	u32 blk_start, blk_count;
> >>>>> +	struct mmc *mmc = find_mmc_device(dfu->dev_num);
> >>>>> +	u32 blk_start, blk_count, n = 0;
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 	/*
> >>>>> 	 * We must ensure that we work in lba_blk_size chunks,
> >>>>> so ALIGN @@ -38,12 +39,28 @@ static int mmc_block_op(enum
> >>>>> dfu_op op, struct dfu_entity *dfu, return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> 	}
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -	sprintf(cmd_buf, "mmc %s %p %x %x",
> >>>>> -		op == DFU_OP_READ ? "read" : "write",
> >>>>> -		 buf, blk_start, blk_count);
> >>>>> +	debug("%s: %s dev: %d start: %d cnt: %d buf: 0x%p\n",
> >>>>> __func__,
> >>>>> +	      op == DFU_OP_READ ? "MMC READ" : "MMC WRITE",
> >>>>> dfu->dev_num,
> >>>>> +	      blk_start, blk_count, buf);
> >>>>> +	switch (op) {
> >>>>> +	case DFU_OP_READ:
> >>>>> +		n = mmc->block_dev.block_read(dfu->dev_num,
> >>>>> blk_start,
> >>>>> +					      blk_count, buf);
> >>>>> +		break;
> >>>>> +	case DFU_OP_WRITE:
> >>>>> +		n = mmc->block_dev.block_write(dfu->dev_num,
> >>>>> blk_start,
> >>>>> +					       blk_count, buf);
> >>>>> +		break;
> >>>>> +	default:
> >>>>> +		error("Operation not supported\n");
> >>>>> +	}
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -	debug("%s: %s 0x%p\n", __func__, cmd_buf, cmd_buf);
> >>>>> -	return run_command(cmd_buf, 0);
> >>>>> +	if (n != blk_count) {
> >>>>> +		error("MMC operation failed");
> >>>>> +		return -EIO;
> >>>>> +	}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +	return 0;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> static int mmc_file_buffer(struct dfu_entity *dfu, void *buf,
> >>>>> long *len) -- 
> >>>>> 1.7.10.4
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> 
> >>> Lukasz Majewski
> >>> 
> >>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Lukasz Majewski
> > 
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group