[U-Boot] [PATCH][v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for B4860QDS
York Sun
yorksun at freescale.com
Fri Mar 7 19:30:52 CET 2014
On 03/07/2014 05:23 AM, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
> Changes:
> 1. L2 cache is being invalidated by Boot ROM code for e6500 core.
> So removing the invalidation from start.S
> 2. Clear the LAW and corresponding configuration for CPC. Boot ROM
> code uses it as hosekeeping area.
> 3. For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house
> keeping area. This configuration is to be disabled once in uboot.
> Earlier this disabling of CPC as SRAM was happening in cpu_init_r.
> As a result cache invalidation function was getting skipped in
> case CPC is configured as SRAM.This was causing random crashes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal at freescale.com>
> ---
> README | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h | 6 ++++++
> boards.cfg | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Changes from v3:
> Renamed the macro to indicate CPC configured as SRAM at U-boot entry to
> CONFIG_SYS_CPC_SRAM
Aneesh,
I understand you are trying to address the comment about when CPC needs to be
disabled before initializing as normal CPC. But introducing CONFIG_SYS_CPC_SRAM
seems even more confusing. Let's take one step back.
CPC as SRAM can be used for many reasons. There is only one reason we should
keep it as SRAM, i.e. u-boot is indeed using SRAM as its final destination. For
all other usages, we can safely reconfigure it as normal CPC after u-boot
relocates itself into DDR. If u-boot's final destination is SRAM, it is a
RAMBOOT. Can we use this condition to deal with CPC?
Do you see the need to disable CPC before relocation? You are doing so in this
patch. Does the temporary LAW or address conflict with u-boot?
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list