[U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v1 8/9] sunxi: non-FEL SPL boot support for sun7i
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Fri Mar 21 15:58:57 CET 2014
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:22:50AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:33:19PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 03:19:40PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 15:03 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On 03/14/2014 02:50 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 03/14/2014 03:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:33:50AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Based linux-sunxi#sunxi commit d854c4de2f57 "arm: Handle .gnu.hash section in
> > > > >>> ldscripts" vs v2014.01.
> > > > >> [snip]
> > > > >>> +/* Flat Device Tree (FDT/DT) support */
> > > > >>> +#define CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
> > > > >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_BOOTMAPSZ (16 << 20)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This seems pretty small. This is to keep things from being relocated
> > > > >> into highmem right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm, this reminds me that we currently need to do a "env set fdt_high ffffffff"
> > > > > in our boot scripts to get ftd to work at all. Would be nice to fix this for
> > > > > upstream. I'm afraid I'm clueless as to why we (sunxi) need it, but we do.
> > > >
> > > > You want to be setting bootm_low (even for bootz, it's about the
> > > > underlying boot mechanics that bootz and bootelf and ... hook into) to
> > > > the amount of lowmem the kernel will have. We do this because we do
> > > > want to make sure that the device tree isn't overwritten by the kernel
> > > > BSS or similar. Everyone with more DDR than kernel lowmem needs to be
> > > > doing something along these lines.
> > >
> > > So, I'm confused about what to do here ;-)
> >
> > And I've not made things clearer with a mis-recollection of things. I
> > don't know why I keep saying "bootm_low" when I mean "bootm_size" like
> > I've done in later patches (and thankfully, when poking people on G+).
> >
> > There's three ways to say "Please ensure that the FDT and if passed initrd
> > do not relocate above a certain location".
> > 1) In the environment, set bootm_size to kernel lowmem. This means that
> > boot_start_lmb restricts the pool used by both fdt and initrd to that
> > value at the top.
> > 2) In the environment, set fdt_high (and if using initrd, initrd_high)
> > to the top of lowmem. This means that we'll make sure they don't get
> > relocated above that value.
> > 3) In the environment set initrd_high to top of lowmem and set
> > bootm_mapsize to lowmem.
> >
> > In all of the above, lowmem can be replaced with any valid size that's
> > also smaller than lowmem, such as 256MB. Another option, in the
> > environment, is to set initrd_high and fdt_high to 0xffffffff and then
> > relocation is disabled. I would _not_ recommend this in the general
> > case as one of the points of relocation is to ensure we don't get
> > overwritten by the kernel BSS.
>
> IIRC, we added it not to make sure that it was in lowmem, but because
> we had issues with large enough kernels (multi_v7_defconfig + embedded
> initramfs) that would overwrite the relocated DTB whenever it was
> decompressing itself.
Right. The series of problems often goes:
1) Oops, DTB moved into high mem, set fdt_high 0xffffffff to stop that
2) Oops, DTB overwritten by kernel, change fdt load addr.
Which is why relocation is a good thing (at least on the device tree
which tends to be small enough to not be a noticable thing) in the
default case.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140321/dcddf5d4/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list