[U-Boot] Native builds broken ?
selsinork at gmail.com
selsinork at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 00:08:09 CEST 2014
Trying to build the u-boot master branch today from 0b2da7e209f4110b7c81d578336a10330e4a4404
natively on arm gives
make: arm-linux-gcc: Command not found
/bin/sh: arm-linux-gcc: command not found
dirname: missing operand
Try 'dirname --help' for more information.
CHK include/config/uboot.release
UPD include/config/uboot.release
CHK include/generated/version_autogenerated.h
/bin/sh: arm-linux-gcc: command not found
/bin/sh: arm-linux-ld.bfd: command not found
UPD include/generated/version_autogenerated.h
CHK include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h
UPD include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h
CC lib/asm-offsets.s
/bin/sh: arm-linux-gcc: command not found
/data/linux/source/u-boot/./Kbuild:34: recipe for target 'lib/asm-offsets.s' failed
make[1]: *** [lib/asm-offsets.s] Error 127
Makefile:997: recipe for target 'prepare0' failed
make: *** [prepare0] Error 2
ways around this appear to be to revert 9b6e2c363f2686d6f7bf61fbe58b7591b71d3e8b
"kbuild: fix CROSS_COMPILE settings in config.mk"
or to start a native build with
make CROSS_COMPILE=
which seems rather counter-intuitive.
I'm no makefile/Kbuild expert, but wouldn't the changes to arch/*/config.mk
be better done like this
ifneq ($(HOSTARCH),$(ARCH))
ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
CROSS_COMPILE := arm-linux-
endif
endif
so that we only set CROSS_COMPILE if we're actually cross compiling instead of
forcing it when it's intentionally empty because we're building natively ?
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list