[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] imx-common: cpu: add fdt_file environment variable

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Mon Mar 31 21:22:18 CEST 2014


On Monday, March 31, 2014 at 08:36:55 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> On 3/29/2014 4:11 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
> > Hi Troy,
> > 
> > On 03/29/2014 03:34 PM, Troy Kisky wrote:
> >> This removes one block in the move toward 1 u-boot
> >> for both a mx6q (quad) and mx6dl (duallite) processor.
> >> 
> >> Now fdt_file hardcoded value can be removed.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky at boundarydevices.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>   arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c | 44
> >>   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/lib/board.c    
> >>    |  7 +++++++
> >>   2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c b/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
> >> index a77c4de..5d48011 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c
> >> @@ -180,3 +180,47 @@ void arch_preboot_os(void)
> >> 
> >>       ipuv3_fb_shutdown();
> >>   
> >>   }
> >>   #endif
> >> 
> >> +
> >> +const char *get_dtb_prefix(u32 imxtype)
> >> +{
> >> +    switch (imxtype) {
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX6Q:
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX6D:
> >> +        return "imx6q";        /* Quad/Dual-core version of the mx6 */
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX6DL:
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO:
> >> +        return "imx6dl";    /* Dual Lite/Solo version of the mx6 */
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX6SL:
> >> +        return "imx6sl";    /* Solo-Lite version of the mx6 */
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX51:
> >> +        return "imx51";
> >> +    case MXC_CPU_MX53:
> >> +        return "imx53";
> >> +    }
> >> +    return "??";
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > I really dislike this implementation of naming policy in code.
> 
> It is not truly a policy. It is a convenience which can be ignored
> if so desired. Though I do agree that cpu and board environment variables
> would also be useful. Still, a cpu variable would still require
> some scripting to combine the quad/dual, duallite/solo. So, your
> way is not as convenient for dtb file names.

You can make the CPU code set the CPU type into some variable. Afterwards, some 
scripts in the HUSH can assemble the DTB name based on those variables. This 
would be much more generic and re-usable than this ...

Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list