[U-Boot] Call for participation in the U-Boot Mini Summit 2014

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:30:35PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:

[snip]
> > It's easier to work with than fitImage.
> 
> In which way?

In most developer work flows at least zImage then uImage then fitImage
are the easiest to work with, in that order, for ARM.  For ARM64 Image
in the next release will probably release uImage as the easiet to work
with.

fitImage seems useful in a lot of deployment scenarios.  Having to craft
up a good skeleton device tree in most cases is an annoying to overcome
barrier for a development workflow.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140905/622a7e48/attachment.pgp>