[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] zynqmp: Add SPI driver support for ZynqMP

Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Fri Apr 17 10:40:42 CEST 2015


On 17 April 2015 at 11:02, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 08:13 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On 15 April 2015 at 19:03, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>> From: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <siva.durga.paladugu at xilinx.com>
>>>
>>> Added the SPI driver support for ZynqMP
>>> The controller is same as zynq SPI controller
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <sivadur at xilinx.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynqmp/hardware.h | 3 +++
>>>  include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h             | 8 ++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynqmp/hardware.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynqmp/hardware.h
>>> index 1fedb1bb4b94..c9dc49d78317 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynqmp/hardware.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynqmp/hardware.h
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
>>>  #define ZYNQ_SERIAL_BASEADDR0  0xFF000000
>>>  #define ZYNQ_SERIAL_BASEADDR1  0xFF001000
>>>
>>> +#define ZYNQ_SPI_BASEADDR0     0xFF040000
>>> +#define ZYNQ_SPI_BASEADDR1     0xFF050000
>>> +
>>>  #define ZYNQ_I2C_BASEADDR0     0xFF020000
>>>  #define ZYNQ_I2C_BASEADDR1     0xFF030000
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h b/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h
>>> index 54bca6d47b72..df7541b85baf 100644
>>> --- a/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h
>>> +++ b/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp.h
>>> @@ -71,6 +71,14 @@
>>>  #define CONFIG_CMD_ELF
>>>  #define CONFIG_MP
>>>
>>> +/* SPI */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZYNQ_SPI
>>> +# define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH
>>> +# define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SST
>>> +# define CONFIG_CMD_SPI
>>
>> CMD_SPI is never been verified I suppose, if so not required at this
>> point of time.
>
> It is enabled on 75 platforms that's why I can't see any problem with
> it. If something is not verified then it should be verified. If it is
> completely broken it should be removed.

I do understand that it uses more boards based on their usage and need,
I believe zynq_spi mostly for flash related ops, if ie the case CMD_SF
enough I guess.

thaks!
-- 
Jagan.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list