[U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers: usb: fsl: Workaround for Erratum A004477
nikhil.badola at freescale.com
nikhil.badola at freescale.com
Fri Apr 24 05:54:26 CEST 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:10 AM
> To: Badola Nikhil-B46172; Albert ARIBAUD
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers: usb: fsl: Workaround for Erratum
> A004477
>
>
>
> On 04/09/2015 08:29 PM, nikhil.badola at freescale.com wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot at aribaud.net]
> >> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 6:00 PM
> >> To: Badola Nikhil-B46172
> >> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers: usb: fsl: Workaround for
> >> Erratum
> >> A004477
> >>
> >> Hello Nikhil,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:25:21 +0530, Nikhil Badola
> >> <nikhil.badola at freescale.com> wrote:
> >>> Add a delay of 1 microsecond before issuing soft reset to the
> >>> controller to let ongoing ULPI transaction complete.
> >>> This prevents corruption of ULPI Function Control Register which
> >>> eventually prevents phy clock from entering to low power mode
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Badola <nikhil.badola at freescale.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Depends on patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/404879/
> >>>
> >>> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c | 4 ++++
> >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h | 6 ++++++
> >>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>> include/fsl_usb.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c
> >>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c
> >>> index fe3eb06..bc59352 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c
> >>> @@ -298,6 +298,10 @@ static int do_errata(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int
> >>> flag, int
> >> argc, char * const argv[])
> >>> if (has_erratum_a007798())
> >>> puts("Work-around for Erratum A007798 enabled\n");
> >> #endif
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> + if (has_erratum_a004477())
> >>> + puts("Work-around for Erratum A004477 enabled\n"); #endif
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_I2C_A004447
> >>> if ((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_8548 && IS_SVR_REV(svr, 3, 1)) ||
> >>> (SVR_REV(svr) <= CONFIG_SYS_FSL_A004447_SVR_REV)) diff --git
> >>> a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
> >>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
> >>> index 7860b40..fe9e9c1 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
> >>> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004508 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A007075 #define
> >> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A006261
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_A004447_SVR_REV 0x10
> >>> #define CONFIG_ESDHC_HC_BLK_ADDR
> >>>
> >>> @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@
> >>> #define CONFIG_FSL_SATA_ERRATUM_A001 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004508 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A005125
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>>
> >>> #elif defined(CONFIG_P1023)
> >>> #define CONFIG_MAX_CPUS 2
> >>> @@ -372,6 +374,7 @@
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SRIO_MSG_UNIT_NUM 2
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004508 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A005125
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> #define CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT 1
> >>>
> >>> #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC_P2041) /* also supports P2040 */ @@ -589,6
> >>> +592,7 @@ #define CONFIG_NAND_FSL_IFC #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_ESDHC111 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A005125
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> #define CONFIG_ESDHC_HC_BLK_ADDR
> >>>
> >>> #elif defined(CONFIG_BSC9132)
> >>> @@ -613,6 +617,7 @@
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PCIE_COMPAT "fsl,qoriq-pcie-v2.2"
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A005125 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A005434
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_I2C_A004447
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_A004447_SVR_REV 0x11
> >>> #define CONFIG_ESDHC_HC_BLK_ADDR
> >>> @@ -712,6 +717,7 @@
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A006475 #define
> >>> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A006384 #define
> >> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A007212
> >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A004477
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_CCSRBAR_DEFAULT 0xfe000000
> >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SFP_VER_3_0
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
> >>> b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c index 5d4288d..41ff1a7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
> >>> @@ -138,6 +138,16 @@ int ehci_hcd_init(int index, enum usb_init_type
> >> init,
> >>> if (has_erratum_a007798())
> >>> set_txfifothresh(ehci, TXFIFOTHRESH);
> >>>
> >>> + if (has_erratum_a004477()) {
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * When reset is issued while any ULPI transaction is ongoing
> >>> + * then it may result to corruption of ULPI Function Control
> >>> + * Register which eventually causes phy clock to enter low
> >>> + * power mode which stops the clock. Thus delay is required
> >>> + * before reset to let ongoing ULPI transaction complete.
> >>
> >> Actually the erratum suggests checking transaction status before
> >> issuing a soft reset. Here, could the code do this check and wait for
> >> the transation to finish, rather than wait for an arbitrary duration?
> >
> > There have been discussions with IP team for changing the suggested
> workaround.
> > The erratum talks about the ULPI transactions i.e from controller to
> > ULPI phy and not the USB schedule transactions .Hence halting the
> > controller before soft reset isn't the correct workaround.
> > In addition, as per the current flow of usb start/reset, the
> > controller is always in halt set before issuing soft reset. This is taken care by
> usb_stop().
> >
> > Regarding the delay of 1 microsecond( minimum delay), it seems to be
> > sufficient for ULPI Transactions to complete as ULPI interface runs on
> 60Mhz clock.
> >
>
> Guys,
>
> Is there any open comment on this patch? Do we all agree on this approach?
> Are we still waiting for IP team for the workaround?
>
IP team has agreed to change previous workaround to the 1us delay workaround
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list