[U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: core: Correct bug introduced in uclass_first/next_device()
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sat Apr 25 06:33:07 CEST 2015
These functions now rely on uclass_find_first/next_device() and assume that
they will either return failure (-ve error code) or a device. In fact,
coming to the end of a list is not considered failure and they return 0
in that case.
The logic to deal with this was replaced in commit acb9ca2a with just using
uclass_get_device_tail(). Add back the missing logic. This bug was
caught by unit tests but since they were broken for other reasons at the
time, this was not noticed.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---
drivers/core/uclass.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/core/uclass.c b/drivers/core/uclass.c
index 04e939d..7de8173 100644
--- a/drivers/core/uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/core/uclass.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ int uclass_get_device_tail(struct udevice *dev, int ret,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ assert(dev);
ret = device_probe(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -342,6 +343,8 @@ int uclass_first_device(enum uclass_id id, struct udevice **devp)
*devp = NULL;
ret = uclass_find_first_device(id, &dev);
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
return uclass_get_device_tail(dev, ret, devp);
}
@@ -352,6 +355,8 @@ int uclass_next_device(struct udevice **devp)
*devp = NULL;
ret = uclass_find_next_device(&dev);
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
return uclass_get_device_tail(dev, ret, devp);
}
--
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list