[U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: i2c: mxc support DM

Peng Fan Peng.Fan at freescale.com
Sun Apr 26 09:37:00 CEST 2015


Hi Simon,

I missed this mail, and sent out a V2 version patch which still has 
bus_i2c_init there, but refactors the driver and support dm, 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/464544/.
I'll send out a V3 version soon.

On 4/24/2015 12:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 19 April 2015 at 23:49, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan at freescale.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing. I'll address most comments and try to merge DM and
>> non-DM part into one. will send out v2 for review.
>> The only unsure part is bus_i2c_init, I also reply you inline. I want to
>> pass force_idle_bus and pinmux setting to i2c driver, so i use bus_i2c_init,
>> same with non-DM way.
> We should not pass functions to driver model. It is better to just
> have a weak function or something like that, that your driver calls
> out to.
Agree.
>
> With pinmux, you should be able to encode it in the device tree. If
> not, again I think it is the lesser of two evils to call out to a
> separate function.
>
> If we get a pinctl uclass one day then you could move it over then.
Yeah.
About the weak function, I reply inline.
>
>>
>> On 4/19/2015 9:53 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Peng,
>>>
>>> On 15 April 2015 at 03:35, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan at freescale.com> wrote:
>>>> Add support when CONFIG_DM_I2C configured.
>>>>
>>>> Test results:
>>>> => i2c dev 0
>>>> Setting bus to 0
>>>> => i2c probe
>>>> Valid chip addresses: 08 50
>>>> => i2c md 8 38
>>>> 0038: 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08    ................
>>>> => i2c mw 8 38 5 1
>>>> => i2c md 8 38
>>>> 0038: 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05    ................
>>>> => dm tree
>>>>    Class       Probed   Name
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>    root        [ + ]    root_driver
>>>>    thermal     [   ]    |-- imx_thermal
>>>>    simple_bus  [ + ]    |-- soc
>>>>    simple_bus  [   ]    |   |-- aips-bus at 30000000
>>>>    simple_bus  [   ]    |   |   |-- anatop at 30360000
>>>>    simple_bus  [   ]    |   |   `-- snvs at 30370000
>>>>    simple_bus  [   ]    |   |-- aips-bus at 30400000
>>>>    simple_bus  [ + ]    |   `-- aips-bus at 30800000
>>>>    i2c         [ + ]    |       |-- i2c at 30a20000
>>>>    i2c_generic [ + ]    |       |   |-- generic_8
>>>>    i2c_generic [ + ]    |       |   `-- generic_50
>>>>    i2c         [   ]    |       |-- i2c at 30a40000
>>>>    spi         [   ]    |       `-- qspi at 30bb0000
>>>>    simple_bus  [   ]    `-- regulators
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan at freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c            |   4 +
>>>>    arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxc_i2c.h |   5 +
>>>>    drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c                     | 354
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    3 files changed, 363 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
>>>> b/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
>>>> index 1a632e7..99fe112 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
>>>> @@ -99,8 +99,12 @@ int setup_i2c(unsigned i2c_index, int speed, int
>>>> slave_addr,
>>>>           if (ret)
>>>>                   goto err_idle;
>>>>
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_I2C
>>>>           bus_i2c_init(i2c_bases[i2c_index], speed, slave_addr,
>>>>                           force_idle_bus, p);
>>>> +#else
>>>> +       bus_i2c_init(i2c_index, speed, slave_addr, force_idle_bus, p);
>>> One of the goals of driver model is to remove code like this, and have
>>> the devices init themselves when they are used. Here you are probing
>>> each device and then changing its configuration outside the device's
>>> probe() method. This should not be needed with driver model. See
>>> below.
>> Agree. But i want to pass force_idle_bus and pinmux settings(parameter p) to
>> i2c driver. I did not find a good way how to pass these two to DM mxc_i2c
>> driver.
>>
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>>           return 0;
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxc_i2c.h
>>>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxc_i2c.h
>>>> index af86163..8f9c83e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxc_i2c.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/mxc_i2c.h
>>>> @@ -54,8 +54,13 @@ struct i2c_pads_info {
>>>>
>>>>    int setup_i2c(unsigned i2c_index, int speed, int slave_addr,
>>>>                 struct i2c_pads_info *p);
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_I2C
>>>>    void bus_i2c_init(void *base, int speed, int slave_addr,
>>>>                   int (*idle_bus_fn)(void *p), void *p);
>>>> +#else
>>>> +void bus_i2c_init(int index, int speed, int slave_addr,
>>>> +               int (*idle_bus_fn)(void *p), void *p);
>>>> +#endif
>>>>    int bus_i2c_read(void *base, uchar chip, uint addr, int alen, uchar
>>>> *buf,
>>>>                   int len);
>>>>    int bus_i2c_write(void *base, uchar chip, uint addr, int alen,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
>>>> index fc5ee35..9488e24 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
>>>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>>>>    #include <asm/io.h>
>>>>    #include <i2c.h>
>>>>    #include <watchdog.h>
>>>> +#include <dm.h>
>>>> +#include <fdtdec.h>
>>>>
>>>>    DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -224,6 +226,7 @@ static int tx_byte(struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs, u8
>>>> byte)
>>>>           return 0;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_I2C
>>>>    /*
>>>>     * Stop I2C transaction
>>>>     */
>>>> @@ -552,3 +555,354 @@ U_BOOT_I2C_ADAP_COMPLETE(mxc2, mxc_i2c_init,
>>>> mxc_i2c_probe,
>>>>                            CONFIG_SYS_MXC_I2C3_SPEED,
>>>>                            CONFIG_SYS_MXC_I2C3_SLAVE, 2)
>>>>    #endif
>>>> +#else
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Information about one i2c bus
>>>> + * struct i2c_bus - information about the i2c[x] bus
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @id: Index of i2c bus
>>> What do you mean by 'index'? Is this actually used? I think you should
>>> drop this. See dev->seq for a probed device.
>> Yeah, it is not used. Will remove it.
>>>
>>>> + * @speed: Speed of i2c bus
>>>> + * @driver_data: Flags for different platforms, not used now.
>>> You could drop it, or change to ulong.
>> Will change it to ulong, and use it cover the I2C_QUIRK_REG.
>>
>>> \> + * @regs: Pointer, the address of i2c bus
>>>> + * @idle_bus_fn: function to force bus idle
>>> We should not call functions like this in driver model.
>> I can  not follow you about this. idle_bus_fn is used to force bus idle,
>> when something err during data transfer.
>>
>>>> + * @idle_bus_data: parameter for idle_bus_fun
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct i2c_bus {
>>>> +       int id;
>>>> +       int speed;
>>>> +       int pinmux_config;
>>>> +       int driver_data;
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *regs;
>>>> +       int (*idle_bus_fn)(void *p);
>>>> +       void *idle_bus_data;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Stop I2C transaction
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void i2c_imx_stop(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs = i2c_bus->regs;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       unsigned int temp = readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +
>>>> +       temp &= ~(I2CR_MSTA | I2CR_MTX);
>>>> +       writeb(temp, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +       ret = wait_for_sr_state(i2c_regs, ST_BUS_IDLE);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               debug("%s:trigger stop failed\n", __func__);
>>>> +       return;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int i2c_idle_bus(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       if (i2c_bus && i2c_bus->idle_bus_fn)
>>>> +               return i2c_bus->idle_bus_fn(i2c_bus->idle_bus_data);
>>> Can you explain what this does?
>> Used to force bus idle when something err during data transfer. You can see
>> arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c, there is a function "force_idle_bus" which
>> is used to force i2c bus idle using gpio mode.
> This could in principle be done generically. If you specify the pins
> which are used by the I2C, these could be flipped to GPIO mode for the
> force_bus_idle, then flipped back to I2C mode later, using a pinctl
> library. Anyway, for now just calling the function seems OK, and no
> need for a function pointer as it just pretends that this is the way
> we want it ultimately IMO.
The i.MX linux i2c driver using this way:
504                 pinctrl_i2c1: i2c1grp {
505                         fsl,pins = <
506 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO01__I2C1_SDA          0x4001b8b1
507 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO00__I2C1_SCL          0x4001b8b1
508 >;
509                 }
It does not contain GPIO mode. But uboot mxc_i2c is different from linux 
imx i2c driver, I think better add GPIO mode for uboot mxc_i2c like this:
504                 pinctrl_i2c1: i2c1grp {
505                         fsl,pins = <
506 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO01__I2C1_SDA          0x4001b8b1
507 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO01__GPIO1_IO01     0x001b8b1
508 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO00__I2C1_SCL          0x4001b8b1
509 MX6SX_PAD_GPIO1_IO00__GPIO1_IO00      0x001b8b1
510 >;
509                 }
To mxc_i2c DM, we can convert this dts to i2c_pad_info structure. And 
pass i2c_pad_info to force_bus_idle(void *priv), like this: 
"force_bus_idle((void*) i2c_bus->pad_info)". Since force_bus_idle is 
static function in arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxc7.c, need to discard the 
static type.

I agree to introduce a weak function for force_bus_idle.
>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void i2c_init_controller(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus)
>>> Drop this function? It seems to do nothing.
>> ok.
>>
>>>> +{
>>>> +       if (!i2c_bus->speed)
>>>> +               return;
>>>> +
>>>> +       debug("%s: speed=%d\n", __func__, i2c_bus->speed);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int mxc_i2c_set_bus_speed(struct udevice *bus, unsigned int
>>>> speed)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus = dev_get_priv(bus);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return bus_i2c_set_bus_speed(i2c_bus->regs, speed);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int mxc_i2c_probe(struct udevice *bus)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus = dev_get_priv(bus);
>>>> +       fdt_addr_t addr;
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_bus->id = bus->seq;
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * driver_dats is not used now, later we can use driver data
>>>> +        * to cover I2C_QUIRK_REG and etc.
>>>> +        *
>>>> +        * TODO
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       i2c_bus->driver_data = dev_get_of_data(bus);
>>> dev_get_driver_data() now.
>> ok.
>>
>>>> +
>>>> +       addr = dev_get_addr(bus);
>>>> +       if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
>>>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_bus->regs = (struct mxc_i2c_regs *)addr;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * Pinmux settings are in board file now, until pinmux is
>>>> supported,
>>>> +        * we can set pinmux here in probe function.
>>>> +        *
>>>> +        * TODO: Pinmux
>>>> +        */
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_init_controller(i2c_bus);
>>>> +       debug("i2c : controller bus %d at %p , speed %d: ",
>>>> +             bus->seq, i2c_bus->regs,
>>>> +             i2c_bus->speed);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void bus_i2c_init(int busnum, int speed, int slave, int
>>>> (*idle_bus_fn)(void *p),
>>>> +                 void *idle_bus_data)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct udevice *bus;
>>>> +       struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = uclass_get_device_by_seq(UCLASS_I2C, busnum, &bus);
>>>> +       if (ret) {
>>>> +               debug("Cannot find I2C bus %d\n", busnum);
>>>> +               return;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_bus = dev_get_priv(bus);
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_bus->idle_bus_fn = idle_bus_fn;
>>>> +       i2c_bus->idle_bus_data = idle_bus_data;
>>>> +
>>>> +       mxc_i2c_set_bus_speed(bus, speed);
>>> This should move into your probe function. You should not need
>>> bus_i2c_init(). See for example tegra_i2c_probe().
>> I want to use "force_bus_idle" and pinmux settings, but I did not find a
>> good way to pass force_bus_idle to the i2c driver. bus_i2c_init is called
>> from arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +       return;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int i2c_init_transfer_(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus, u32 chip,
>>>> +                             bool read)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       unsigned int temp;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs = i2c_bus->regs;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* Enable I2C controller */
>>>> +#ifdef I2C_QUIRK_REG
>>>> +       if (readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr) & I2CR_IDIS) {
>>>> +#else
>>>> +       if (!(readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr) & I2CR_IEN)) {
>>>> +#endif
>>> Can you work this out from the device tree or the driver data, and
>>> avoid the #ifdef?
>> will use driver data to work this out.
>>
>>>> +               writeb(I2CR_IEN, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +               /* Wait for controller to be stable */
>>>> +               udelay(50);
>>>> +       }
>>>> +       if (readb(&i2c_regs->iadr) == (chip << 1))
>>>> +               writeb((chip << 1) ^ 2, &i2c_regs->iadr);
>>>> +       writeb(I2SR_IIF_CLEAR, &i2c_regs->i2sr);
>>>> +       ret = wait_for_sr_state(i2c_regs, ST_BUS_IDLE);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* Start I2C transaction */
>>>> +       temp = readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +       temp |= I2CR_MSTA;
>>>> +       writeb(temp, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = wait_for_sr_state(i2c_regs, ST_BUS_BUSY);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       temp |= I2CR_MTX | I2CR_TX_NO_AK;
>>>> +       writeb(temp, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* write slave address */
>>>> +       ret = tx_byte(i2c_regs, chip << 1 | read);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +               i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int i2c_init_transfer(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus, u32 chip, bool
>>>> read)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int retry;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs = i2c_bus->regs;
>>>> +
>>>> +       for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
>>>> +               ret = i2c_init_transfer_(i2c_bus, chip, read);
>>>> +               if (ret >= 0)
>>>> +                       return 0;
>>>> +               i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +               if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +               debug("%s: failed for chip 0x%x retry=%d\n", __func__,
>>>> chip,
>>>> +                     retry);
>>>> +               if (ret != -ERESTART)
>>>> +                       /* Disable controller */
>>>> +                       writeb(I2CR_IDIS, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +               udelay(100);
>>>> +               if (i2c_idle_bus(i2c_bus) < 0)
>>>> +                       break;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       debug("%s: give up i2c_regs=%p\n", __func__, i2c_regs);
>>>> +       return ret;
>>>> +}
>>> This looks very similar to the old i2c_init_transfer(). Can you create
>>> a common function and avoid copying the code?
>> Just want to not mix with non-DM part. Since we are migrating to DM, mix DM
>> and non-DM will introuce more #ifdefs. I'll look into whether can use a
>> common function to cover DM and non-DM part.
>>> Also in the old function
>>> you dealt with 'alen' (now called offset length) but I don't see that
>>> code here.
>> Here I suppose only support 7 bit, so I just removed alen, seems better to
>> keep it. Will add it back and use the flags from chip->flags to determine
>> alen.
>>
> I think alen is actually the number of bytes needed to specify a
> register address in the I2C chip. With driver model I called that
> offset_length to avoid confusion with the 7/10-bit address. Shoult if
> I have this wrong.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +static int mxc_i2c_probe_chip(struct udevice *bus, u32 chip_addr,
>>>> +                             u32 chip_flags)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus = dev_get_priv(bus);
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = i2c_init_transfer(i2c_bus, chip_addr, false);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int i2c_write_data(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus, uchar chip, uchar
>>>> *buffer,
>>>> +                         int len, bool end_with_repeated_start)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int i, ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs = i2c_bus->regs;
>>> blank line should move up one.
>> ok.
>>
>>>> +       debug("i2c_write_data: chip=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", chip, len);
>>>> +       debug("write_data: ");
>>>> +       /* use rc for counter */
>>>> +       for (i = 0; i < len; ++i)
>>>> +               debug(" 0x%02x", buffer[i]);
>>>> +       debug("\n");
>>>> +
>>>> +       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>>> +               ret = tx_byte(i2c_regs, buffer[i]);
>>>> +               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +                       debug("i2c_write_data(): rc=%d\n", ret);
>>>> +                       break;
>>>> +               }
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (end_with_repeated_start) {
>>>> +               /* Reuse ret */
>>>> +               ret = readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +               ret |= I2CR_RSTA;
>>>> +               writeb(ret, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +
>>>> +               ret = tx_byte(i2c_regs, (chip << 1) | 1);
>>>> +               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +                       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>> +               }
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int i2c_read_data(struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus, uchar chip, uchar
>>>> *buf,
>>>> +                        int len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       unsigned int temp;
>>>> +       int i;
>>>> +       struct mxc_i2c_regs *i2c_regs = i2c_bus->regs;
>>>> +
>>>> +       debug("i2c_read_data: chip=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", chip, len);
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* setup bus to read data */
>>>> +       temp = readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +       temp &= ~(I2CR_MTX | I2CR_TX_NO_AK);
>>>> +       if (len == 1)
>>>> +               temp |= I2CR_TX_NO_AK;
>>>> +       writeb(temp, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +       writeb(I2SR_IIF_CLEAR, &i2c_regs->i2sr);
>>>> +       readb(&i2c_regs->i2dr);         /* dummy read to clear ICF */
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* read data */
>>>> +       for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>>>> +               ret = wait_for_sr_state(i2c_regs, ST_IIF);
>>>> +               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +                       debug("i2c_read_data(): ret=%d\n", ret);
>>>> +                       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>> +               }
>>>> +
>>>> +               /*
>>>> +                * It must generate STOP before read I2DR to prevent
>>>> +                * controller from generating another clock cycle
>>>> +                */
>>>> +               if (i == (len - 1)) {
>>>> +                       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +               } else if (i == (len - 2)) {
>>>> +                       temp = readb(&i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +                       temp |= I2CR_TX_NO_AK;
>>>> +                       writeb(temp, &i2c_regs->i2cr);
>>>> +               }
>>>> +               writeb(I2SR_IIF_CLEAR, &i2c_regs->i2sr);
>>>> +               buf[i] = readb(&i2c_regs->i2dr);
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* reuse ret for counter*/
>>>> +       for (ret = 0; ret < len; ++ret)
>>>> +               debug(" 0x%02x", buf[ret]);
>>>> +       debug("\n");
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>> Again we have duplicated code. While we have both driver model and
>>> non-drivel-model code co-existing, we should try to avoid this.
>> ok. will try to merge them into a common one.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int mxc_i2c_xfer(struct udevice *bus, struct i2c_msg *msg, int
>>>> nmsgs)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct i2c_bus *i2c_bus = dev_get_priv(bus);
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = i2c_init_transfer(i2c_bus, msg->addr, false);
>>>> +       if (ret < 0)
>>>> +               return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +       for (; nmsgs > 0; nmsgs--, msg++) {
>>>> +               bool next_is_read = nmsgs > 1 && (msg[1].flags &
>>>> I2C_M_RD);
>>>> +               debug("i2c_xfer: chip=0x%x, len=0x%x\n", msg->addr,
>>>> msg->len);
>>>> +               if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>>>> +                       ret = i2c_read_data(i2c_bus, msg->addr, msg->buf,
>>>> +                                           msg->len);
>>>> +               else
>>>> +                       ret = i2c_write_data(i2c_bus, msg->addr,
>>>> msg->buf,
>>>> +                                            msg->len, next_is_read);
>>>> +               if (ret) {
>>>> +                       debug("i2c_write: error sending\n");
>>>> +                       return -EREMOTEIO;
>>> return ret? Is the error the wrong value?
>> should return ret. Thanks for correcting me.
>>>
>>>> +               }
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       i2c_imx_stop(i2c_bus);
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct dm_i2c_ops mxc_i2c_ops = {
>>>> +       .xfer           = mxc_i2c_xfer,
>>>> +       .probe_chip     = mxc_i2c_probe_chip,
>>>> +       .set_bus_speed  = mxc_i2c_set_bus_speed,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct udevice_id mxc_i2c_ids[] = {
>>>> +       { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-i2c", },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-i2c", },
>>>> +       {}
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +U_BOOT_DRIVER(i2c_mxc) = {
>>>> +       .name = "i2c_mxc",
>>>> +       .id = UCLASS_I2C,
>>>> +       .of_match = mxc_i2c_ids,
>>>> +       .probe = mxc_i2c_probe,
>>>> +       .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct i2c_bus),
>>>> +       .ops = &mxc_i2c_ops,
>>>> +};
>>>> +#endif
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.4
> Regards,
> Simon
> .
>



More information about the U-Boot mailing list