[U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: core: Add platform specific bus translation function

[Stefan Roese]

Hi Simon,

( Last mail for tonight - a glass of quite nice red wine is
waiting for me ... ;) )

On 02.12.2015 17:53, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2 December 2015 at 09:00, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 02.12.2015 16:50, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> I think it would be better to make it depend on whether the bit is
>>>>> flipped, rather than whether you are in SPL or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You simply can't detect if this "bit is flipped". You just have
>>>> to know. This is a long lasting ugly thing on some Marvell
>>>> patforms. Here the comment from armada-xp-gp.dts:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you point me to the place in U-Boot where this bit is flipped?
>>> Something, somewhere has to make the change. So something has to know.
>>> Before it makes the change, the range works one way. Afterwards it
>>> works another way.
>>
>>
>> Sure. I've mentioned this before. Its here:
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/cpu.c:
>>
>> int arch_cpu_init(void)
>> {
>>          ...
>>
>>          /* Linux expects the internal registers to be at 0xf1000000 */
>>          writel(SOC_REGS_PHY_BASE, INTREG_BASE_ADDR_REG);
>>
>> This is the line that changes the register base address. And
>> to change it back you need to write to the new address, as the
>> address holding this base address is also moved. Quite ugly!
>>
>> So its really right at the start of U-Boot proper.
>
> OK I see. So really we can determine which way the address 'switch'
> it. It's just a case of making the change when we are ready, and
> keeping a record of that.

Yes. But how is the "common code" in dev_get_addr() supposed to know
which version of U-Boot we are running on? This boils down to some
callback again, or not? Or even worse the ugly #ifdef.

Thanks,
Stefan