[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 05/16] spi: Add support for dual and quad mode
Mugunthan V N
mugunthanvnm at ti.com
Sun Dec 6 07:03:23 CET 2015
On Thursday 03 December 2015 09:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 12:35, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com> wrote:
>> spi bus can support dual and quad wire data transfers for tx and
>> rx. So defining dual and quad modes for both tx and rx. Also add
>> support to parse bus width used for spi tx and rx transfers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/spi.h | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>> index 58388ef..62d8da7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>> @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ int spi_slave_ofdata_to_platdata(const void *blob, int node,
>> struct dm_spi_slave_platdata *plat)
>> {
>> int mode = 0;
>> + int value;
>>
>> plat->cs = fdtdec_get_int(blob, node, "reg", -1);
>> plat->max_hz = fdtdec_get_int(blob, node, "spi-max-frequency", 0);
>> @@ -360,6 +361,38 @@ int spi_slave_ofdata_to_platdata(const void *blob, int node,
>> mode |= SPI_CS_HIGH;
>> if (fdtdec_get_bool(blob, node, "spi-half-duplex"))
>> mode |= SPI_PREAMBLE;
>> +
>> + /* Device DUAL/QUAD mode */
>> + value = fdtdec_get_uint(blob, node, "spi-tx-bus-width", 1);
>> + switch (value) {
>> + case 1:
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + mode |= SPI_TX_DUAL;
>> + break;
>> + case 4:
>> + mode |= SPI_TX_QUAD;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + error("spi-tx-bus-width %d not supported\n", value);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + value = fdtdec_get_uint(blob, node, "spi-rx-bus-width", 1);
>> + switch (value) {
>> + case 1:
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + mode |= SPI_RX_DUAL;
>> + break;
>> + case 4:
>> + mode |= SPI_RX_QUAD;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + error("spi-rx-bus-width %d not supported\n", value);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>
> I think these are similar to SPI TX/RX operation modes in spi.h and I
> understand this is similar approach as with Linux but before this we
> need to do many changes on u-boot as well.
I agree that op_mode_rx/op_mode_tx can be used. I just tried to follow
Linux way of implementation to have consistency between Linux and
U-Boot. If you feel that using op_mode_(rx/tx) will be the best
approach, I can repost the series with the changes.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list