[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 14/14] sf: Rename sf_ops.c to spi-flash.c

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Fri Dec 11 07:51:15 CET 2015


Hi Jagan,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 11 December 2015 11:53 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10 December 2015 at 07:01, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 December 2015 at 11:34, Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since all spi-flash core operations are moved into
>>>>>> sf_ops.c then it's better to renamed as spi-flash.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>   drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile                  | 2 +-
>>>>>>   drivers/mtd/spi/{sf_ops.c => spi-flash.c} | 7 ++++---
>>>>>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>   rename drivers/mtd/spi/{sf_ops.c => spi-flash.c} (99%)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> (but I suggest spi_flash.c is better as it fits with the other files)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. spi_flash.c makes more sense. So far it looks that only driver
>>>> model uclass driver is using - in the file name, others are using _.
>>>
>>>
>>> Clear, but this file will handle common spi-flash core functionalities
>>> it shouldn't be dm even now or later and more over underlying sf_probe
>>> which is calling this through spi_flash_scan has a driver model on it.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. But my comment is to
>> rename sf_ops.c to sf_flash.c, not sf-flash.c.
>
>
>
> spi-flash.c (the function spi_flash_scan from sf_probe, so this never be a
> dm driver and it handles all core functionalities
> ======================================================================
> sf_probe.c (this has dm support)
> =================================
>
> Since you're saying dm has - and ie the reason I'm saying spi-flash.c should
> technically a dm supported core.
>

I was saying it looks to me that only dm uclass driver is allowed to
have -, like sf-uclass.c or pci-uclass.c. Other files we should use _.

> Let me know if you're not clear though.
>

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list