[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: Use mode instead of op_mode_tx
Jagan Teki
jteki at openedev.com
Mon Dec 14 08:35:13 CET 2015
On Monday 14 December 2015 01:01 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com> wrote:
>> Used mode member from spi_slave{} instead of op_mode_tx.
>>
>> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jteki at openedev.com>
>> ---
>> Changes for v2:
>> - none
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/spi/ich.c | 2 +-
>> include/spi.h | 8 ++------
>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> index 0cafc29..3519ffd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int spi_flash_std_write(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len,
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SST)
>> if (flash->flags & SNOR_F_SST_WR) {
>> - if (flash->spi->op_mode_tx & SPI_OPM_TX_BP)
>> + if (flash->spi->mode & SPI_TX_BP)
>
> Did you ever build this? spi->mode is declared as a u8, but SPI_TX_BP is 0x100.
Look like I sent the wrong patch, I made mode as uint will send that.
thanks!
--
Jagan
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list