[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] dm: x86: Create a driver for x86 interrupts

[Simon Glass]

Hi Bin,

On 14 December 2015 at 22:45, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Bin,
>>>
>>> On 13 December 2015 at 23:05, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> It seems likely that at some point we will want a generic interrupt uclass.
>>>>> But this is a big undertaking as it involves unifying code across multiple
>>>>> architectures.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a first step, create a simple IRQ uclass and a driver for x86. This can
>>>>> be generalised later as required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adjust pirq_init() to probe this driver, which has the effect of creating
>>>>> routing tables and setting up the interrupt routing. This is a start
>>>>> towards making interrupts fit better with driver model.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I will test this series when all previous DM changes are applied.
>>>
>>> Do you mean the series that I just pushed to dm/next. or something else?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I mean all previous DM changes as I suspect this series has some
>> dependency on previous series. I will apply this series on top of
>> dm/next and test there.
>
> patch#4, patch#5 does not apply on top of dm/next. I guess there are
> some other dependencies?

I'm not sure, but you can use u-boot-dm/pcid-working for your testing.

Regards,
Simon