[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: imx6: Add DDR3 calibration code for MX6 Q/D/DL

[Eric Nelson]

Hi Marek,

On 12/16/2015 08:33 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 04:00:38 PM, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 12/16/2015 07:40 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Add DDR3 calibration code for i.MX6Q, i.MX6D and i.MX6DL. This code
>>> fine-tunes the behavior of the MMDC controller in order to improve
>>> the signal integrity and memory stability.
>>
>> I'm glad to see that others are interested in this.
>>
>> I've been working on something similar, but struggling to have time
>> to finish and clean it up:
>> 	https://github.com/ericnelsonaz/u-boot/tree/memcal-pass1
>>
>> My aim is/was a bit different though, and aims to be a replacement for
>> the DDR stress tool, which is cumbersome to use.
> 
> Excellent, we can add this as an optional feature or something which can
> be triggered by command, since the "full" calibration takes some time.
> 
>> To do that, I put together a pseudo-board with Kconfig options for
>> the serial console, memory bus width, and such.
> 
> Or maybe this can be built as a mutated SPL ?
> 

That's how I have things hacked together. The board "mx6memcal"
essentially **only** produces SPL.

It runs calibration, then spits out the results in a form usable by
either a .cfg file or SPL data structure.

I'd like to add a trailing memory test with frequency walking as
done with the DDR stress tool before submitting it though.

>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c            | 559
>>>  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-ddr.h |   5 +
>>>  2 files changed, 564 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
>>> index 6b039e4..194411f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,565 @@
>>
>>>  #include <asm/io.h>
>>>  #include <asm/types.h>
>>
>> I'll review this in detail later, but off-hand, I think this could use
>> a new CONFIG_ variable to exclude it from boards that don't use it.
>>
>> It also shouldn't be difficult to support i.MX6SL and LPDDR here.
> 
> This is OK, the code will be compiled for these MX6 variants, but it will
> be dropped from the final binary if you don't call it explicitly (see patch
> 2/2).
> 

Gotcha.

> I don't have SX/SL, so I couldn't test it there.
> 

I have a couple of SL boards, so I can do that (mx6slevk and a custom
board using DDR3). Both of them support SPL, so it shouldn't take
long to validate.

Regards,


Eric