[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/8] dm: Expand the uclass for Platform Controller Hubs (PCH)
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Dec 21 10:16:27 CET 2015
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> A Platform Controller Hub is an Intel concept - it is like the peripherals
> on an SoC and is often in a separate chip from the CPU. The chip is typically
> found on the first PCI bus and integrates multiple devices.
>
> We have a very simple uclass to support PCHs. Add a few operations, such as
> setting up the devices on the PCH and finding the SPI controller base
> address. Also move it into drivers/pch/ since we will be adding a few PCH
> drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Add a PCH method to enable/disable SPI flash protection
> - Drop the pch_init() call
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Update the commit message and header file comments
> - Use an enum for the PCH version
> - Replace SBASE with SPI base
> - Add a TODO to check if the init() method can be removed later
>
> arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pch/Makefile | 5 ++
> {arch/x86/lib => drivers/pch}/pch-uclass.c | 32 +++++++++++++
> include/pch.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pch/Makefile
> rename {arch/x86/lib => drivers/pch}/pch-uclass.c (50%)
> create mode 100644 include/pch.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> index cd5ecb6..43792bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I8254_TIMER) += i8254.o
> ifndef CONFIG_DM_PCI
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci_type1.o
> endif
> -obj-y += pch-uclass.o
> obj-y += pirq_routing.o
> obj-y += relocate.o
> obj-y += physmem.o
> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> index c9031f2..acc6af9 100644
> --- a/drivers/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ obj-y += hwmon/
> obj-y += misc/
> obj-y += pcmcia/
> obj-y += dfu/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += pch/
> obj-y += rtc/
> obj-y += sound/
> obj-y += timer/
> diff --git a/drivers/pch/Makefile b/drivers/pch/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d69a99c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pch/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +#
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +#
> +
> +obj-y += pch-uclass.o
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/pch-uclass.c b/drivers/pch/pch-uclass.c
> similarity index 50%
> rename from arch/x86/lib/pch-uclass.c
> rename to drivers/pch/pch-uclass.c
> index 20dfa81..4579ed1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/pch-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/pch/pch-uclass.c
> @@ -7,10 +7,42 @@
>
> #include <common.h>
> #include <dm.h>
> +#include <pch.h>
> #include <dm/root.h>
>
> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>
> +int pch_get_sbase(struct udevice *dev, ulong *sbasep)
> +{
> + struct pch_ops *ops = pch_get_ops(dev);
> +
> + *sbasep = 0;
> + if (!ops->get_sbase)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + return ops->get_sbase(dev, sbasep);
> +}
> +
> +enum pch_version pch_get_version(struct udevice *dev)
Should the return value be int given it can return -ENOSYS which is not enum?
> +{
> + struct pch_ops *ops = pch_get_ops(dev);
> +
> + if (!ops->get_version)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + return ops->get_version(dev);
> +}
> +
> +int pch_set_spi_protect(struct udevice *dev, bool protect)
> +{
> + struct pch_ops *ops = pch_get_ops(dev);
> +
> + if (!ops->set_spi_protect)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + return ops->set_spi_protect(dev, protect);
> +}
> +
> static int pch_uclass_post_bind(struct udevice *bus)
> {
> /*
> diff --git a/include/pch.h b/include/pch.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..39c9300
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/pch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2015 Google, Inc
> + * Written by Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __pch_h
> +#define __pch_h
> +
> +enum pch_version {
> + PCHV_UNKNOWN,
> + PCHV_7,
> + PCHV_9,
> +};
> +
> +/* Operations for the Platform Controller Hub */
> +struct pch_ops {
> + /**
> + * get_sbase() - get the address of SPI base
> + *
> + * @dev: PCH device to check
> + * @sbasep: Returns address of SPI base if available, else 0
> + * @return 0 if OK, -ve on error (e.g. there is no SPI base)
> + */
> + int (*get_sbase)(struct udevice *dev, ulong *sbasep);
> +
> + /**
> + * get_version() - get the PCH version
> + *
> + * @return version, or -1 if unknown
-ENOSYS if not implemented
> + */
> + enum pch_version (*get_version)(struct udevice *dev);
> +
> + /**
> + * set_spi_protect() - set whether SPI flash is protected or not
> + *
> + * @dev: PCH device to adjust
> + * @protect: true to protect, false to unprotect
> + *
> + * @return 0 on success, -ENOSYS if not implemented
> + */
> + int (*set_spi_protect)(struct udevice *dev, bool protect);
> +};
> +
> +#define pch_get_ops(dev) ((struct pch_ops *)(dev)->driver->ops)
> +
> +/**
> + * pch_get_sbase() - get the address of SPI base
> + *
> + * @dev: PCH device to check
> + * @sbasep: Returns address of SPI base if available, else 0
> + * @return 0 if OK, -ve on error (e.g. there is no SPI base)
> + */
> +int pch_get_sbase(struct udevice *dev, ulong *sbasep);
> +
> +/**
> + * pch_get_version() - get the PCH version
> + *
> + * @return version, or -ve if unknown/error
-ENOSYS if not implemented
> + */
> +enum pch_version pch_get_version(struct udevice *dev);
> +
> +/**
> + * set_spi_protect() - set whether SPI flash is protected or not
> + *
> + * @dev: PCH device to adjust
> + * @protect: true to protect, false to unprotect
> + *
> + * @return 0 on success, -ENOSYS if not implemented
> + */
> +int pch_set_spi_protect(struct udevice *dev, bool protect);
> +
> +#endif
> --
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list