[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] altera_qspi: show erase progress

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Thu Dec 24 06:37:31 CET 2015


On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 06:24:45 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 2015年12月24日 11:42, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 04:26:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >> Hi Marek,
> > 
> > Hi Thomas,
> > 
> >> On 2015年12月24日 11:02, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 03:50:57 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >>>> Hi Marek,
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 2015年12月24日 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 01:51:23 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> >>>>>> Show sector erase progress with dot and comma.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou <thomas at wytron.com.tw>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Shouldn't this go into common code ?
> >>>> 
> >>>> The code to print a dot is minimal. It will cost more if this go into
> >>>> common code.
> >>> 
> >>> But then this driver behaves in a non-standard manner AND noone
> >>> benefits from this functionality but this driver.
> >> 
> >> The sector erase might take very long when there are a lot of sectors to
> >> erase, say 12 min to 50 min for 1024 sectors on the 10m50 board. Without
> >> the display of progress, it will look like the board hangs.
> > 
> > Yeah, that I do understand and I agree this is a good idea :)
> > 
> >> The dotting code comes from the old cfi_flash.c. Some other parallel
> >> flash have this, but not spi-flash. It is trivial to add though.
> > 
> > Urm, altera_qspi is CFI, right ? So can we stuff this into common code or
> > not? Sorry if I am confused and off the mark.
> 
> No worries. I think the dotting is best done per driver.

Well why do you think so ?

> We can have
> common behavior. But there is little advantage to make it common code.
> 
> Merry Xmas.

Merry Xmas to you too!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list