[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] [v4] hash: Add function to find hash_algo struct with progressive hash
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Jan 2 23:24:27 CET 2015
Hi Ruchika,
On 30 December 2014 at 02:30, Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta at freescale.com> wrote:
> The hash_algo structure has some implementations in which progressive hash
> API's are not defined. These are basically the hardware based implementations
> of SHA. An API is added to find the algo which has progressive hash API's
> defined. This can then be integrated with RSA checksum library which uses
> Progressive Hash API's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta at freescale.com>
> CC: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> Few cosmetic changes. Currently I have not replaced CONFIG_SHA1 with CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM.
> Waiting for reply from Simon and Denx for the same.
./tools/buildman/buildman -b try-rsa MPC8308RDB
boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do.
Building 10 commits for 1 boards (1 thread, 32 jobs per thread)
10 0 0 /10 MPC8308RDB
(try-rsa=458103: asc) u> ./tools/buildman/buildman -b try-rsa MPC8308RDB -sS
boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do.
Summary of 10 commits for 1 boards (1 thread, 32 jobs per thread)
01: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-usb
02: rsa: Split the rsa-verify to separate the modular exponentiation
03: FIT: Modify option FIT_SIGNATURE in Kconfig
04: DM: crypto/rsa: Add rsa Modular Exponentiation DM driver
05: configs: Move CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE to defconfig
06: lib/rsa: Modify rsa to use DM driver
07: DM: crypto/fsl - Add Freescale rsa DM driver
08: lib/rsa: Add Kconfig for devices supporting RSA Modular Exponentiation
09: hash: Add function to find hash_algo struct with progressive hash
powerpc: (for 1/1 boards) all +208.0 data +28.0 text +180.0
10: rsa: Use checksum algorithms from struct hash_algo
(no errors to report)
(try-rsa=458103: asc) u>
So this adds 180 bytes of code space. I really don't think that is a
big problem, so I think this patch is fine. I'll Wolfgang chime in if
he disagrees.
>
> Changes in v3 :
> Corrected ifdef for SHA1
>
> Changes in v2 :
> Added commit message
>
> common/hash.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/hash.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/hash.c b/common/hash.c
> index 12d6759..ea1ec60 100644
> --- a/common/hash.c
> +++ b/common/hash.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/errno.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHA1
> static int hash_init_sha1(struct hash_algo *algo, void **ctxp)
> {
> sha1_context *ctx = malloc(sizeof(sha1_context));
> @@ -125,12 +125,7 @@ static struct hash_algo hash_algo[] = {
> CHUNKSZ_SHA256,
> },
> #endif
> - /*
> - * This is CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM instead of CONFIG_SHA1 since otherwise
> - * it bloats the code for boards which use SHA1 but not the 'hash'
> - * or 'sha1sum' commands.
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHA1
> {
> "sha1",
> SHA1_SUM_LEN,
> @@ -140,7 +135,6 @@ static struct hash_algo hash_algo[] = {
> hash_update_sha1,
> hash_finish_sha1,
> },
> -#define MULTI_HASH
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SHA256
> {
> @@ -152,7 +146,6 @@ static struct hash_algo hash_algo[] = {
> hash_update_sha256,
> hash_finish_sha256,
> },
> -#define MULTI_HASH
> #endif
> {
> "crc32",
> @@ -165,6 +158,10 @@ static struct hash_algo hash_algo[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SHA256) || defined(CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM)
> +#define MULTI_HASH
> +#endif
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_HASH_VERIFY) || defined(CONFIG_CMD_HASH)
> #define MULTI_HASH
> #endif
> @@ -311,6 +308,24 @@ int hash_lookup_algo(const char *algo_name, struct hash_algo **algop)
> return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> }
>
> +int hash_progressive_lookup_algo(const char *algo_name,
> + struct hash_algo **algop)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hash_algo); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(algo_name, hash_algo[i].name)) {
> + if (hash_algo[i].hash_init) {
> + *algop = &hash_algo[i];
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> + }
Can't you just call hash_lookup_algo() and then check for hash_init?
> +
> + debug("Unknown hash algorithm '%s'\n", algo_name);
> + return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> +}
> +
> void hash_show(struct hash_algo *algo, ulong addr, ulong len, uint8_t *output)
> {
> int i;
> diff --git a/include/hash.h b/include/hash.h
> index d8ec4f0..c0a7ebc 100644
> --- a/include/hash.h
> +++ b/include/hash.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,20 @@ int hash_block(const char *algo_name, const void *data, unsigned int len,
> int hash_lookup_algo(const char *algo_name, struct hash_algo **algop);
>
> /**
> + * hash_progressive_lookup_algo() - Look up hash_algo for prog. hash support
> + *
> + * The function returns the pointer to the struct or -EPROTONOSUPPORT if the
> + * algorithm is not available with progressive hash support.
> + *
> + * @algo_name: Hash algorithm to look up
> + * @algop: Pointer to the hash_algo struct if found
> + *
> + * @return 0 if ok, -EPROTONOSUPPORT for an unknown algorithm.
> + */
> +int hash_progressive_lookup_algo(const char *algo_name,
> + struct hash_algo **algop);
> +
> +/**
> * hash_show() - Print out a hash algorithm and value
> *
> * You will get a message like this (without a newline at the end):
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list