[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: enable CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default (re-send to the correct address)

[Masahiro Yamada]

2015-07-02 8:39 GMT+09:00 Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck at gmail.com>:
>
>
> Am 02.07.2015 um 00:04 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>
>> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 23:50:17 +0200, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Actually I think it is inherently wrong to enable
>>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
>>>
>>> This option is intended as a workaround for broken toolchains, until
>>> these get fixed.  By enabling this by default, we miss do not notice
>>> the problems our tool chain has, and therefore these never get fixed,
>>> i. e. brokenness grows.  This cannot be good.
>>>
>>> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should only be an emergency-opt-in, but
>>> never ever a default setting.
>>
>> Well then, should we not revisit commits c3dd823 and 7bfd5ee, which
>> enable CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC for sh and mips respectively? Either
>> we allow it by default for all architectures, or we forbid it by
>> default for all architectures, but I don't like the idea of a
>> heterogeneous per-arch default setting.
>>
>
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC should be removed. If an architecture supports
> a private libgcc, then it should always use it. I think for U-Boot it is
> better and safer to have all code under control instead of pulling in
> external code from toolchains which are often somehow broken.
>
> Speaking for MIPS we have boards with all combinations of Big
> Endian/Little Endian and Hard Float/Soft Float. You need an own libgcc
> binary for each FPU variant, but almost no toolchain supports this. Thus
> you need different toolchains for different boards. This is a PITA for
> users or developers who want to use buildman. Always using
> CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes was the only painless way so far. That is
> why we chose to enable CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC by default.
>
> BTW: Linux kernel or Barebox always use a private libgcc.
>


I agree with Daniel.

Instead of removing CONFIG_USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC,
I think it is better to "select" it by Kconfig.

(And rename it to CONFIG_HAVE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC
in order to clearly indicate it is not a user-configurable
but forced configuration.)




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada