[U-Boot] [PATCH 02/11] imx: mx6ul: Add pins IOMUX head file

[Marek Vasut]

On Thursday, July 02, 2015 at 01:02:59 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> Add i.MX6UL pins IOMUX file which defines the IOMUX settings for choose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan at freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ye.Li <B37916 at freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h   |    2 +
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h | 1065
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 1067 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h index 534f780..4b6bb18 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ enum {
>  #include "mx6sl_pins.h"
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_MX6SX)
>  #include "mx6sx_pins.h"
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_MX6UL)
> +#include "mx6ul_pins.h"
>  #else
>  #error "Please select cpu"
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_MX6Q */

Would it be possible to build a single image for an entire MX6 lineup
of CPUs ? I think it is now possible to build a single image for MX6
Quad/Dual/DualLite/Solo ... do SX and UL integrate well into this too?
Seeing this patch, I don't think so ...

> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c92b4f0

How very different is this from Solo or SoloX ? Is the pinmux map
really that different that it needs a new file of it's own (I did
not check) ?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut