[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 01/12] x86: delete unneeded declarations of disable_irq() and enable_irq()
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 06:46:09 CEST 2015
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
> These two declarations in arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h conflict
> with ones in include/linux/compat.h, so x86 boards cannot include
> <linux/compat.h>.
>
> The comment /* arch/x86/lib/interrupts.c */ is bogus now, and we do
> not see any definitions of disable_irq() and enable_irq() in there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h
> index 0a75f89..00cbe07 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/interrupt.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
> /* arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c */
> void set_vector(u8 intnum, void *routine);
>
> -/* arch/x86/lib/interrupts.c */
> -void disable_irq(int irq);
> -void enable_irq(int irq);
> -
> /* Architecture specific functions */
> void mask_irq(int irq);
> void unmask_irq(int irq);
> --
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list