[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 02/12] linux_compat: remove cpu_relax() define

Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro at socionext.com
Wed Jul 8 07:19:32 CEST 2015


2015-07-08 14:01 GMT+09:00 Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>:
> Hello Masahiro,
>
>
> Am 08.07.2015 um 06:29 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
>>
>> The macro cpu_relax() is defined by several headers in different
>> ways.
>>
>> arch/{arm,avr32,mips}/include/asm/processor.h defines it as follows:
>>    #define cpu_relax()  barrier()
>>
>> On the other hand, include/linux/compat.h defines it as follows:
>>    #define cpu_relax() do {} while (0)
>>
>> If both headers are included from the same source file, the warning
>>    warning: "cpu_relax" redefined [enabled by default]
>> is displayed.
>>
>> It effectively makes it impossible to include <linux/compat.h>
>> from some sources.  Drop the latter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   drivers/usb/musb-new/musb_gadget_ep0.c | 1 +
>>   include/linux/compat.h                 | 2 --
>>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb-new/musb_gadget_ep0.c
>> b/drivers/usb/musb-new/musb_gadget_ep0.c
>> index 5a71501..415a9f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb-new/musb_gadget_ep0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb-new/musb_gadget_ep0.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>>   #else
>>   #include <common.h>
>>   #include "linux-compat.h"
>> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>>   #endif
>>
>>   #include "musb_core.h"
>> diff --git a/include/linux/compat.h b/include/linux/compat.h
>> index 6ff3915..da1420f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/compat.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/compat.h
>> @@ -315,8 +315,6 @@ struct notifier_block {};
>>
>>   typedef unsigned long dmaaddr_t;
>>
>> -#define cpu_relax() do {} while (0)
>> -
>
>
> doesn;t this lead to compie errors on archs, which does not define
> this?
>
> If so, we should add this in arch/{xxx}/include/asm/processor.h
>
> beside of that.
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>


No worry.

Buildman assured this series did not break any board, at least for compile test.

Run test was done only on some boards I have, of course...




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada


More information about the U-Boot mailing list