[U-Boot] [PATCH 05/16] cgtqmx6eval: Improve the error handling

[Marek Vasut]

On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 05:23:07 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Perfoming an OR operation on the error is not a good approach.
> 
> Return the error immediately for each ESDHC instance instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
> ---
> 
>  board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
> b/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c index eb6395a..b23859c 100644
> --- a/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
> +++ b/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ int board_mmc_getcd(struct mmc *mmc)
>  int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
>  {
>  	s32 status = 0;
> +	int i;
> 
>  	usdhc_cfg[0].sdhc_clk = mxc_get_clock(MXC_ESDHC2_CLK);
>  	usdhc_cfg[1].sdhc_clk = mxc_get_clock(MXC_ESDHC4_CLK);
> @@ -107,10 +108,13 @@ int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
>  	imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(
>  				usdhc4_pads, ARRAY_SIZE(usdhc4_pads));
> 
> -	status = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[0]) |
> -		     fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[1]);
> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {

Is this magic 2 equal to ARRAY_SIZE(usdhc_cfg) ?

> +		status = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[i]);
> +		if (status)
> +			return status;
> +	}
> 
> -	return status;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif

Best regards,
Marek Vasut