[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/15] cgtqmx6eval: Improve the error handling

[Otavio Salvador]

Perfoming an OR operation on the error is not a good approach.

Return the error immediately for each ESDHC instance instead.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
---

Changes in v2:
- use ARRAY_SIZE(usdhc_cfg) (Marek)

 board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c b/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
index eb6395a..0f43d3c 100644
--- a/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
+++ b/board/congatec/cgtqmx6eval/cgtqmx6eval.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ int board_mmc_getcd(struct mmc *mmc)
 int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
 {
 	s32 status = 0;
+	int i;
 
 	usdhc_cfg[0].sdhc_clk = mxc_get_clock(MXC_ESDHC2_CLK);
 	usdhc_cfg[1].sdhc_clk = mxc_get_clock(MXC_ESDHC4_CLK);
@@ -107,10 +108,13 @@ int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
 	imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(
 				usdhc4_pads, ARRAY_SIZE(usdhc4_pads));
 
-	status = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[0]) |
-		     fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[1]);
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(usdhc_cfg); i++) {
+		status = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[i]);
+		if (status)
+			return status;
+	}
 
-	return status;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.4.5