[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/40] fdt: Add functions to retrieve strings

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
> 
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:17:18 +0200, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > +Scott, Masahiro
> > > 
> > > Hi Thierry,
> > > 
> > > On 25 March 2015 at 17:23, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi Thierry,
> > > >
> > > > On 8 September 2014 at 09:02, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > >> Applied to u-boot-fdt/next, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Did you submit these patches to dtc upstream? I don't see them applied.
> > > 
> > > Ping? Masahiro has now sent a series on top of your patches, so we
> > > need to sort this out.
> > 
> > I sent these to the DTC maintainers and the list, with you and Masahiro
> > in Cc. They patches should be eqivalent to what's in U-Boot except for
> > the node parameter that I renamed nodeoffset for consistency with libfdt
> > and the testsuite bits.
> 
> Do you mean there are intrinsic incompatibilities between U-Boot and
> Linux that make it impossible to use the same name in both?

No, I don't think so. Back at the time I must have assumed that node was
the consistent name used in U-Boot, but it seems like these string
functions are now the only ones in libfdt that use this. I'd expect that
to fix itself when libfdt gets sync'ed back from the upstream copy.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150715/d981707a/attachment.sig>