[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Select CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR by default

Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 00:55:02 CEST 2015


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:21:44PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:12:16PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> >
>> >> Select CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR by default rather then
>> >> needing to have this in every sunxi defconfig file.
>> >>
>> >> This also fixes the Merrii_A80_Optimus defconfig no longer building.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at enea.com>
>> >> Reported-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at enea.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> >
>> > Joe? Masahiro?  It feels like something has gone wrong with the
>> > conversion here.  Or do people need to get used to the defconfig files
>> > being a non-trivial size?  Or do we need some more default y if ...
>> > lines around things?  Or a few of the above?  Thanks!
>>
>> It seems we should select good defaults. Maybe we should try to agree
>> which way we should err. Make u-boot bigger by default, and boards
>> that are limited can disable features? Or should we enable commands on
>> boards that "need" a feature and keep u-boot slim by default?
>>
>> I don't like the half measure of defining a different default for one
>> platform than another unless it is actually something inherent in the
>> platform, and in that case it should be enabled by a "selects" under
>> the platform Kconfig.
>>
>> I agree we want to have smaller defconfigs rather than bigger, but
>> there are lots of features and many boards will not agree, so the
>> defconfigs of many boards will have to contain something.
>
> The first thing that pops to mind is that if it used to be in
> config_cmd_default.h it should be on by default and disabled when needed
> (and this means we can be smart about CMD_FLASH / CMD_IMLS).  Otherwise
> we need to think hard on if something new should be on by default or
> not.

I have the gut feeling that things that depend on hardware existing
(such as CMD_NET) should not be default.  However, I guess if it's
totally ubiquitous (such as CMD_MEMORY - though it's already in
config_cmd_default.h) then it should be default just to shrink the
defconfigs.

Ian, you indicated that you thought CMD_NET should be a default since
it is usually wanted. It seems that is generally the case. It looks
like 94% of boards enable CMD_NET, which makes it pretty much
ubiquitous.

Perhaps that should be the metric for deciding (probably with
flexibility for making an argument to the contrary)... if more that
80% (good enough water-mark?) of the boards enable a feature, then it
should be the default?  50% would optimize for overall defconfig
size... maybe that's better?

-Joe


More information about the U-Boot mailing list