[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARMv7: Factor out reusable timer_wait from sunxi/psci_sun7i.S

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 05-06-15 10:41, Wang Dongsheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hans de Goede [mailto:hdegoede at redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:15 PM
>> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Sun York-R58495
>> Cc: ijc at hellion.org.uk; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; jan.kiszka at siemens.com; Jin
>> Zhengxiong-R64188; Wang Huan-B18965; Zhao Chenhui-B35336; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARMv7: Factor out reusable timer_wait from
>> sunxi/psci_sun7i.S
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 04-06-15 06:01, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
>>> From: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang at freescale.com>
>>>
>>> timer_wait is moved from sunxi/psci_sun7i.S, and it can be converted
>>> completely into a reusable armv7 generic timer. LS1021A will use it as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang at freescale.com>
>>
>> Thanks for rebasing this, looks good:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>
>> As for upstreaming this, it is probably best for the entire set to go upstream
>> through the same tree, although if people want I can upstream this one through
>> the sunxi tree.
>>
>> In the mean time I'll add this to the sunxi-wip branch of my personal repo so
>> that it sees some testing (not that I'm expecting any issues).
>>
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> Sorry, I'm confused in your comments.
> I based on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, master branch. Need I change the tree? Or ?

No everything is fine.

What I'm trying to say is that these patches should probably be merged by
the ls102xa maintainer.

Regards,

Hans