[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] x86: fsp: Move FspInitEntry call to board_init_f()
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Jun 5 17:34:10 CEST 2015
On 4 June 2015 at 04:28, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> The call to FspInitEntry is done in arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S so far.
> It worked pretty well but looks not that good. Apart from doing too
> much work than just enabling CAR, it cannot read the configuration
> data from device tree at that time. Now we want to move it a little
> bit later as part of init_sequence_f[] being called by board_init_f().
> This way it looks and works better in the U-Boot initialization path.
>
> Due to FSP's design, after calling FspInitEntry it will not return to
> its caller, instead it jumps to a continuation function which is given
> by bootloader with a new stack in system memory. The original stack in
> the CAR is gone, but its content is perserved by FSP and described by
> a bootloader temporary memory HOB. Technically we can recover anything
> we had before in the previous stack, but that is way too complicated.
> To make life much easier, in the FSP continuation routine we just
> simply call fsp_init_done() and jump back to car_init_ret() to redo
> the whole board_init_f() initialization, but this time with a non-zero
> HOB list pointer saved in U-Boot's global data so that we can bypass
> the FspInitEntry for the second time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Andrew Bradford <andrew.bradford at kodakalaris.com>
>
Tested on Minnowboard MAX:
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> arch/x86/cpu/start.S | 6 +++++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S | 26 +++++---------------------
> arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c | 8 ++++++++
> common/board_f.c | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/start.S b/arch/x86/cpu/start.S
> index 2e5f9da..00e585e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/start.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/start.S
> @@ -116,12 +116,16 @@ car_init_ret:
> rep stosb
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FSP
> + test %esi, %esi
> + jz skip_hob
> +
> /* Store HOB list */
> movl %esp, %edx
> addl $GD_HOB_LIST, %edx
> movl %esi, (%edx)
> -#endif
>
> +skip_hob:
> +#endif
> /* Setup first parameter to setup_gdt, pointer to global_data */
> movl %esp, %eax
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h
> index 67c0098..5d8a96d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ u32 isa_map_rom(u32 bus_addr, int size);
> /* arch/x86/lib/... */
> int video_bios_init(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_FSP
> +int x86_fsp_init(void);
> +#endif
Can we drop the #ifdef here?
> +
> void board_init_f_r_trampoline(ulong) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
> void board_init_f_r(void) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S
> index 5e09568..afbf3f9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_car.S
> @@ -56,28 +56,10 @@ temp_ram_init_ret:
>
> /* stack grows down from top of CAR */
> movl %edx, %esp
> + subl $4, %esp
>
> - /*
> - * TODO:
> - *
> - * According to FSP architecture spec, the fsp_init() will not return
> - * to its caller, instead it requires the bootloader to provide a
> - * so-called continuation function to pass into the FSP as a parameter
> - * of fsp_init, and fsp_init() will call that continuation function
> - * directly.
> - *
> - * The call to fsp_init() may need to be moved out of the car_init()
> - * to cpu_init_f() with the help of some inline assembly codes.
> - * Note there is another issue that fsp_init() will setup another stack
> - * using the fsp_init parameter stack_top after DRAM is initialized,
> - * which means any data on the previous stack (on the CAR) gets lost
> - * (ie: U-Boot global_data). FSP is supposed to support such scenario,
> - * however it does not work. This should be revisited in the future.
> - */
> - movl $CONFIG_FSP_TEMP_RAM_ADDR, %eax
> - xorl %edx, %edx
> - xorl %ecx, %ecx
> - call fsp_init
> + xor %esi, %esi
> + jmp car_init_done
>
> .global fsp_init_done
> fsp_init_done:
> @@ -86,6 +68,8 @@ fsp_init_done:
> * Save eax to esi temporarily.
> */
> movl %eax, %esi
> +
> +car_init_done:
> /*
> * Re-initialize the ebp (BIST) to zero, as we already reach here
> * which means we passed BIST testing before.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> index 001494d..5b25632 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> @@ -46,3 +46,11 @@ void board_final_cleanup(void)
>
> return;
> }
> +
> +int x86_fsp_init(void)
> +{
> + if (!gd->arch.hob_list)
> + fsp_init(CONFIG_FSP_TEMP_RAM_ADDR, BOOT_FULL_CONFIG, NULL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
> index fbbad1b..21be26f 100644
> --- a/common/board_f.c
> +++ b/common/board_f.c
> @@ -753,6 +753,9 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL
> fdtdec_setup,
> #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_FSP)
> + x86_fsp_init,
> +#endif
Would it be possible to put this into arch_cpu_init()? Or do you think
it is better to have a separate call?
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE
> trace_early_init,
> #endif
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list