[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Select CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR by default

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 11-06-15 18:12, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:14:33AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:12:16PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Select CONFIG_CMD_NET and CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR by default rather then
>>>>> needing to have this in every sunxi defconfig file.
>>>>>
>>>>> This also fixes the Merrii_A80_Optimus defconfig no longer building.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at enea.com>
>>>>> Reported-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at enea.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Joe? Masahiro?  It feels like something has gone wrong with the
>>>> conversion here.  Or do people need to get used to the defconfig files
>>>> being a non-trivial size?  Or do we need some more default y if ...
>>>> lines around things?  Or a few of the above?  Thanks!
>>>
>>> I'm surprised you pulled this in for -rc2. I guess we can always revert it.
>>
>> OK, so where did we end up again exactly?  Ah yes, (a) we can't
>> unexpectedly break peoples build.  So I took this for now.
>
> This isn't fixing a breakage...

It does fix breakage as stated i the commit message the Merrii_A80_Optimus
target was broken by your patch, likely because your patch was generated
against a tree which did not have that one yet.

> it simply reduced the size of the sunxi boards' defconfig

That is because I choose a solution were I do not need to fix this over
and over again and one were something which comes pretty close to
pure noise was poluting all the sunxi defconfigs.

 > and caused defconfig noise in every other
> board when running savedefconfig.

I did not realize that, sorry about that.

Regards,

Hans