[U-Boot] [RESPIN PATCH v2 06/15] x86: Ignore function number when writing PIRQ routing table

[Bin Meng]

In fill_irq_info() pci device's function number is written into
the table, however this is not really necessary. The function
number can be anything as OS doesn't care about this field,
neither does the PIRQ routing specification. Change to always
writing 0 as the function number.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---

Changes in v2: None

 arch/x86/cpu/irq.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/irq.c b/arch/x86/cpu/irq.c
index 7d5ccc1..df4300c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/irq.c
@@ -59,12 +59,12 @@ void pirq_assign_irq(int link, u8 irq)
 }
 
 static inline void fill_irq_info(struct irq_info **slotp, int *entries, u8 bus,
-				 u8 device, u8 func, u8 pin, u8 pirq)
+				 u8 device, u8 pin, u8 pirq)
 {
 	struct irq_info *slot = *slotp;
 
 	slot->bus = bus;
-	slot->devfn = (device << 3) | func;
+	slot->devfn = (device << 3) | 0;
 	slot->irq[pin - 1].link = LINK_N2V(pirq, irq_router.link_base);
 	slot->irq[pin - 1].bitmap = irq_router.irq_mask;
 	(*entries)++;
@@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ static int create_pirq_routing_table(void)
 		      PCI_FUNC(pr.bdf), 'A' + pr.pin - 1,
 		      'A' + pr.pirq);
 		fill_irq_info(&slot, &irq_entries, PCI_BUS(pr.bdf),
-			      PCI_DEV(pr.bdf), PCI_FUNC(pr.bdf),
-			      pr.pin, pr.pirq);
+			      PCI_DEV(pr.bdf), pr.pin, pr.pirq);
 		cell += sizeof(struct pirq_routing) / sizeof(u32);
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.2.1