[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/5] Clean out SPL and enable driver model
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Mar 3 15:58:38 CET 2015
Hi Tom,
On 3 March 2015 at 07:48, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:06:15AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > Hi Tom,
>> >
>> > On 2 March 2015 at 17:51, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:19:05PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> On 26 February 2015 at 10:26, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > >> > This series includes a few more patches aimed at getting rid of gdata, the
>> > >> > parallel global_data structure introduced on some ARM boards.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It also collects together the other patches which have been sent previously,
>> > >> > so that everything is in one place.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I would like get this agreed and applied to u-boot-dm this week if possible
>> > >> > so that we will at last have driver model available in SPL.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > This series is available at u-boot-dm/spl-working.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Changes in v5:
>> > >> > - Rebase to master
>> > >>
>> > >> Are there any more comments on this? I know Albert was looking at
>> > >> applying it, but I am tempted to bring it through the u-boot-dm tree
>> > >> and get it in. RC3 is soon!
>> > >
>> > > Did you have something that switched beaglebone black over to this?
>> > > Thanks!
>> >
>> > I think I sent patches at the time but they were too radical. I'm even
>> > nervous about the current set which is why I want time for people to
>> > test this.
>> >
>> > I'll dig this up and send a v6.
>>
>> I recall you had something radical before but I solved those problems (I
>> thought!) differently and that brought us back to the need to add
>> CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R which shouldn't be a big deal. I'm kicking at the
>> problem again differently this morning (aside, conmux + XMODEM is broken
>> in conmux it seem which breaks my workflow on some boards pretty bad).
>
> OK, yeah, it's not _that_ bad:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c
> index 81477aa..4436413 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c
> @@ -204,18 +204,20 @@ int arch_misc_init(void)
> }
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> /*
> * In the case of non-SPL based booting we'll want to call these
> * functions a tiny bit later as it will require gd to be set and cleared
> * and that's not true in s_init in this case so we cannot do it there.
> */
> -int board_early_init_f(void)
> +void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> {
> prcm_init();
> set_mux_conf_regs();
>
> - return 0;
> + sdram_init();
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * This function is the place to do per-board things such as ramp up the
> @@ -298,9 +300,5 @@ void s_init(void)
> /* Enable RTC32K clock */
> rtc32k_enable();
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> - board_early_init_f();
> - sdram_init();
> -#endif
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig b/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> index 2e5aeaa..deecf95 100644
> --- a/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/am335x_evm_defconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
> CONFIG_SPL=y
> +CONFIG_CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
> +CONFIG_CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x82000000
> CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="NAND"
> CONFIG_CONS_INDEX=1
> +S:CONFIG_ARM=y
> diff --git a/include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h b/include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h
> index 2bd1164..1882073 100644
> --- a/include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/ti_armv7_common.h
> @@ -216,7 +216,6 @@
> * end of the BSS area. We place our stack at 32MiB after the start of
> * DRAM to allow room for all of the above.
> */
> -#define CONFIG_SPL_STACK (CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE + (32 << 20))
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x80800000
> #endif
>
> I might even go so far as to say that's a clean-up. I do need to put
> this through it's paces tho on am335x and then work on converting the
> rest of the families.
Yes this looks similar to what I was fiddling with this morning. It's
at u-boot-dm/spl-working. It's just finished a run through buildman so
I'll resend v6. I made a change to the first patch to keep gdata
around for non-DM boards (seems prudent just in case).
>
> But, Albert, shall we put this in right after -rc3?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list