[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 05/11] ARM: OMAP: Change set_pl310_ctrl_reg to be generic
Matt Porter
mporter at konsulko.com
Thu Mar 5 15:00:43 CET 2015
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
> enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of processors as well. The only
> difference being the service being invoked for the function.
>
> So, convert the service to a macro and use a generic name (same as
> that used in Linux for some consistency). While at that, also add a
> data barrier which is necessary as per recommendation.
>
> While at this, switch over to smc #0 instead of handcoded assembly.
> To ensure gcc compatibility, steal the strategy used by Linux kernel
> for sec extension builds (NOTE: we no longer use '-march=armv5' as the
> legacy comment claims).
Hi Nishanth,
I applied this series with fuzz and fixed a minor conflict on master. I
ran into a build issue for omap3 beagle with the sec extension scheme on
the gcc version 4.7.4 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) toolchain:
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc
-Wp,-MD,arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/.lowlevel_init.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.7/include -Iinclude -I../include
-I../arch/arm/include -include ../include/linux/kconfig.h -D__KERNEL__
-D__UBOOT__ -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x80100000 -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g
-D__ARM__ -marm -mno-thumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux
-mword-relocations -march=armv7-a -mno-unaligned-access
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float
-pipe -c -o arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.o
../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S
../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S: Assembler messages:
../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S:34: Error: selected
processor does not support ARM mode `smc #0'
I've worked around this for the moment by placing an explicit
.arch_extension sec in lowlevel_init.S but hopefully you have some
thoughts on why those flags don't seem to be picked up. I'll continue
to take a look at it in the meantime.
-Matt
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile | 3 +++
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S | 17 ++++++++++-------
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/hwinit.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/sys_proto.h | 5 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile
> index 7695e16d36f5..b36e85d25f3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF),)
> obj-y += omap-cache.o
> endif
>
> +plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
> +AFLAGS_lowlevel_init.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
> +
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_OMAP34XX),)
> obj-y += boot-common.o
> obj-y += lowlevel_init.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S
> index 86c0e4217478..83426291b22d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S
> @@ -22,11 +22,14 @@ ENTRY(save_boot_params)
> bx lr
> ENDPROC(save_boot_params)
>
> -ENTRY(set_pl310_ctrl_reg)
> - PUSH {r4-r11, lr} @ save registers - ROM code may pollute
> +ENTRY(omap_smc1)
> + PUSH {r4-r12, lr} @ save registers - ROM code may pollute
> @ our registers
> - LDR r12, =0x102 @ Set PL310 control register - value in R0
> - .word 0xe1600070 @ SMC #0 - hand assembled because -march=armv5
> - @ call ROM Code API to set control register
> - POP {r4-r11, pc}
> -ENDPROC(set_pl310_ctrl_reg)
> + MOV r12, r0 @ Service
> + MOV r0, r1 @ Argument
> + DSB
> + DMB
> + SMC #0 @ Call the secure monitor for the service
> +
> + POP {r4-r12, pc}
> +ENDPROC(omap_smc1)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/hwinit.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/hwinit.c
> index db16548fac49..9792761d40a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/hwinit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/hwinit.c
> @@ -159,11 +159,11 @@ void init_omap_revision(void)
> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_L2CACHE_OFF
> void v7_outer_cache_enable(void)
> {
> - set_pl310_ctrl_reg(1);
> + omap_smc1(OMAP4_SERVICE_PL310_CONTROL_REG_SET, 1);
> }
>
> void v7_outer_cache_disable(void)
> {
> - set_pl310_ctrl_reg(0);
> + omap_smc1(OMAP4_SERVICE_PL310_CONTROL_REG_SET, 0);
> }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_SYS_L2CACHE_OFF */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/sys_proto.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/sys_proto.h
> index e19975efaf50..f425e3af54f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/sys_proto.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/sys_proto.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void do_set_mux(u32 base, struct pad_conf_entry const *array, int size);
> void set_muxconf_regs_essential(void);
> u32 wait_on_value(u32, u32, void *, u32);
> void sdelay(unsigned long);
> -void set_pl310_ctrl_reg(u32 val);
> +void omap_smc1(u32 service, u32 val);
> void setup_clocks_for_console(void);
> void prcm_init(void);
> void bypass_dpll(u32 const base);
> @@ -57,4 +57,7 @@ int omap_vc_bypass_send_value(u8 sa, u8 reg_addr, u8 reg_data);
> u32 warm_reset(void);
> void force_emif_self_refresh(void);
> void setup_warmreset_time(void);
> +
> +#define OMAP4_SERVICE_PL310_CONTROL_REG_SET 0x102
> +
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list