[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Set shared override bit in PL310 AUX_CTRL register

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Thu Mar 12 10:31:58 CET 2015


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:04:31AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:12:12PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
> > 
> > Having bit 22 cleared in the PL310 Auxiliary Control register (shared
> > attribute override enable) has the side effect of transforming Normal
> > Shared Non-cacheable reads into Cacheable no-allocate reads.
> > 
> > Coherent DMA buffers in Linux always have a Cacheable alias via the
> > kernel linear mapping and the processor can speculatively load cache
> > lines into the PL310 controller.
> 
> No, this is wrong.  They do not.  CMA remaps pages to be non-cacheable
> rather than the old technique where the above statement was true.
> 
> There's some corner cases which make that less effective than it once
> was, and as I've already said, those need to be fixed.  The reason
> that these were missed is because all the ARM CMA work bypassed me -
> CMA on ARM has had zero review from the point of view of the ARM
> architecture, so it's not surprising it gets stuff like this wrong.
> 
> Once that's fixed, setting bit 22 is not necessary.

And I strongly disagree with your statement. Seriously, there are so
many assumption about when this bit will no longer be required like the
platform always using CMA, having fixed the CMA code in Linux. That's a
boot loader patch and even though it's used mostly (only) to load Linux,
we should not make this assumption.

Most importantly, not setting this bit makes your SoC non-compliant with
the ARM ARM clarifications on mismatched aliases. It was a hardware
mistake to have it cleared out of reset but just let firmware or
boot-loaders deal with it.

(there are some very specific use-cases for this bit that the hw guys
had in mind but none of them apply to Linux)

-- 
Catalin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list