[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/8] Extend LPC32xx functionality and add LPC32xx-based work_92015 board

[Simon Glass]

Hi Anish,

On 16 March 2015 at 10:28, Anish Khurana <anish.khurana130181 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> can you please share the git branch so that I can also review it. I am
> writing for LPC2148 board.

This is Albert's work. Once he shares if I am sure it will be public.

Regards,
Simon

>
> Thanks,
> Anish
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On 14 March 2015 at 07:49, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud at 3adev.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> Le Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:33:51 -0600, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>> > Hi Albert,
>>> >
>>> > On 13 March 2015 at 02:04, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV)
>>> > <albert.aribaud at 3adev.fr> wrote:
>>> > > This series extends functionality for the LPC32xx platform and
>>> > > introduces the WORK Microwave work_92105 board which makes use
>>> > > of the extended functionality.
>>> > >
>>> > > NOTES:
>>> > >
>>> > > A - I2C driver remains non-DM
>>> > >
>>> > > During v2 review, it was suggested to move to DM for I2C. However,
>>> > > this caused issues with the 'date', 'dtt' and 'eeprom' commands which
>>> > > are configured in this board. Therefore the I2C move to DM was not
>>> > > done.
>>> >
>>> > Does CONFIG_DM_I2C_COMPAT help with this? If you define that you get
>>> > the old API.
>>>
>>> Nope, I tried CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT as soon as I hit the errors, and itdid
>>> not fix things.
>>
>> That's unfortunate. Perhaps there are some things missing.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Otherwise if you can share the (broken) patches I can take a look at
>>> > how to fix those commands.
>>>
>>> I'll push a branch on Monday for this.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll take a look when I get it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot