[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/9] dm: usb: Use usb_get_bus in dm ehci code
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sun May 3 19:20:13 CEST 2015
Hi Hans,
On 3 May 2015 at 11:15, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 05/03/2015 06:59 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On 1 May 2015 at 04:04, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Use usb_get_bus in dm ehci code rather then re-implementing it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 9 +--------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>> index bd9861d..85adbf4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>> @@ -125,14 +125,7 @@ static struct descriptor {
>>> static struct ehci_ctrl *ehci_get_ctrl(struct usb_device *udev)
>>> {
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_DM_USB
>>> - struct udevice *dev;
>>> -
>>> - /* Find the USB controller */
>>> - for (dev = udev->dev;
>>> - device_get_uclass_id(dev) != UCLASS_USB;
>>> - dev = dev->parent)
>>> - ;
>>> - return dev_get_priv(dev);
>>> + return dev_get_priv(usb_get_bus(udev->dev));
>>
>>
>> To be safe shouldn't we check for NULL here?
>
>
> That should never happen, and there already is an assert for
> that in usb_get_bus, or you mean dev_get_priv returning NULL.
No I mean usb_get_bus(). It could be hard to debug if it does happen,
but hopefully the first thing they do is turn on DEBUG in that file
and see the assert().
I think it is OK.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list