[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] x86: coreboot: Don't write I/O port 0xb2 for QEMU targets
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Wed May 27 05:50:25 CEST 2015
Hi Simon,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 25 May 2015 at 08:36, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Writing 0xcb to I/O port 0xb2 (Advanced Power Management Control) causes
>> U-Boot to hang on QEMU q35 target. Disable the writing for QEMU targets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/coreboot.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/coreboot.c b/arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/coreboot.c
>> index 4cdd0d4..2234cf0 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/coreboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/coreboot.c
>> @@ -85,10 +85,6 @@ void board_final_cleanup(void)
>> wrmsrl(MTRR_PHYS_MASK_MSR(top_mtrr), 0);
>> mtrr_close(&state);
>> }
>> -
>> - /* Issue SMI to Coreboot to lock down ME and registers */
>> - printf("Finalizing Coreboot\n");
>> - outb(0xcb, 0xb2);
>> }
>>
>> void panic_puts(const char *str)
>> --
>> 1.8.2.1
>>
>
> But how does this run with coreboot on platforms that need it? Should
> this be controlled by a device tree settings, perhaps?
>
I am not sure if the lock down should be done by the coreboot in the
first place. IMHO U-Boot as the coreboot payload should not touch such
low-level stuff.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list