[U-Boot] [PATCH] Makefile: Include vendor common library in include search path
Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masahiro at socionext.com
Tue Nov 10 04:25:33 CET 2015
2015-11-10 5:24 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>:
>>> I am unhappy because I was hoping
>>> we could stop creating symbolic links during building
>>> in a long run.
>
> But how? I don't see that it is possible if we want to have a sensible
> prefix for each include.
[step 1] move SoC-specific headers to arch/<arch>/mach-<soc>/include/mach
[step 2] change #include <asm/arch/foo.h> to #include <mach/foo.h>
[step 3] Drop CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK
For example, mach-uniphier finished [1] and [2],
so it does not require the symbolic link.
(several ARM SoCs finished [1])
I think this is the way ARM should do, at least.
The topic of debate is PowerPC. Should we introduce mach-<soc>
directories or not?
>>
>> OK. what do we do?
>> option 1:
>> #include "..common/xyz.h"
>> 141 something usage in board files do this for now..
>>
>> option 2:
>> -I...common (auto generated - original patch)
>> #include "xyz.h"
>> we dont like that since it does not tell us that xyz.h is a
>> board-common header.
>>
>> option 3:
>> #include <board-common/xyz.h>
>>
>> this needs a soft link which we dont like either.
>
> Well, I like it :-)
>
>>
>> are there any other ways to do this?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
>
> Regards,
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list