[U-Boot] [PATCH] arc: add stubs for map_physmem() and unmap_physmem()
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Tue Nov 17 00:15:02 CET 2015
On 11/16/2015 03:15 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 14:08 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16 November 2015 at 06:47, Alexey Brodkin
>> <Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon, Stephen,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 19:03 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> On 13 November 2015 at 11:23, Alexey Brodkin
>>>> <Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 11:14 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12 November 2015 at 14:56, Alexey Brodkin
>>>>>> <Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>>>> Up until now there was no need in those stubs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But since following commit compilation of U-Boot on ARC is broken:
>>>>>>> ------------------------>8----------------------
>>>>>>> commit 7861204c9af7fec1ea9b41541c272516235a6c93
>>>>>>> Author: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>>>>>> Date: Sat Oct 3 13:56:46 2015 -0600
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> itest: make memory access work under sandbox
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> itest accesses memory, and hence must map/unmap it. Without doing so, it
>>>>>>> accesses invalid addresses and crashes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>>> ------------------------>8----------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's because CMD_ITEST is enabled by default in common/Kconfig and now
>>>>>>> map_physmem()/unmap_physmem() is used there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So this patch adds missing stubs for ARC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin at synopsys.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>>>>>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> So should I move map_physmem()/unmap_physmem() in generic header and include
>>> it in asm/io.h for every arch (as suggested by Stephen) or for starters I
>>> may have stubs for ARC and once this patch is accepted do clean-up for
>>> all arches at once?
>>
>> Either is fine with me. If you do a shared file it should be in
>> include/asm-generic I think.
>
> Please let me know if you're fine as well with local patch for ARC
> for starters. This quick fix is really necessary because as of today
> U-Boot for ARC couldn't be built at all from current master branch.
Yes, that seems fine; my suggestion was more for post-patch cleanup.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list