[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 5/9] arm: serial: Add ability to use pre-initialized UARTs

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:

>> The MAINTAINERS entry for device tree bindings does not state a
>> git tree and I've never seen any of the maintainers send a pull request for
>> DT binding files. (Beat me up properly if you have, guys.) I've seen
>> Grant send some at times.
>
> Err, what?
>
> $ git log --merges --grep='Pull.*\(Herring\|Likely\)' --oneline
> Documentation/devicetree/

OK nice, bad research from me. My sloppy statement was
based on this:

OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE
M:      Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
M:      Frank Rowand <frowand.list at gmail.com>
M:      Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>
L:      devicetree at vger.kernel.org
W:      http://www.devicetree.org/
T:      git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glikely/linux.git
S:      Maintained
F:      drivers/of/
F:      include/linux/of*.h
F:      scripts/dtc/

> The DT core code and bindings (which don't go thru subsystem trees) go
> together.

I guess I should just send a patch adding

F:    Documentation/devicetree/*

...and hope things get better from that.

>> I suggest sending U-Boot DT bindings to not only
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> but also, as indicated, to Jon Corbet and linux-doc.
>
> I'd suggest devicetree-spec at vger for common things. Perhaps we need a
> better name, but the whole point of this was to separate the common
> issues from the firehose and have multiple OS participation.

Hm, wasn't devicetree at vger.kernel.org supposed to be for that?

>> If noone cares to comment in two weeks, Jon can merge them,
>> breaking the status quo on external DT bindings.
>
> Did someone tell Jon to drink from that firehose?

I'm sorry, I guess this whole mail was something I wrote in light
panic over the increasing threat from the separatists.

Yours,
Linus Walleij