[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] tegra: dts: Sync seaboard device tree file with Linux
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Jan 19 03:01:52 CET 2016
Hi Stephen,
On 18 January 2016 at 12:32, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 01:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Sync everything except the display panel, which will come in a future
>> patch.
>> One USB port is left disabled since we don't want to support it in U-Boot.
>
>
> It would be useful to mention which version of Linux this DT content came
> from.
>
> BTW, this series (at least this patch) seems to have a significant number of
> "git am" conflicts when I try to apply it to either v2016.01 or
> u-boot/master as of today. Consequently I can't apply it to test it. Which
> commit/branch is it based on?
See u-boot-dm/rkf-working, which has all the patches.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
>> b/arch/arm/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
>
>
>> + pinmux at 70000014 {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&state_default>;
>
>
> I agree that the DT content that's common between U-Boot's and Linux's
> copies of the DT files should be identical. However, I wonder if it makes
> sense to include nodes (and perhaps even properties) in U-Boot's DT that
> U-Boot doesn't use.
>
> I can see the argument that keeping the files identical is easier to track
> and remove any differences.
>
> However, I'd also argue that keeping the U-Boot DT files lean (i.e. only
> containing the nodes U-Boot uses) will allow easier determination of exactly
> what parts of the DT U-Boot uses, and hence perhaps highlight any parts that
> might still need conversion.
Indeed. I'm leaning towards including everything since it is simple.
On tegra we don't use pinctrl so that is a waste, but it's not that
huge.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list