[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] spi: omap3: Convert to DM

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Jan 26 02:11:24 CET 2016


+Hans

Hi Tom,

On 21 January 2016 at 05:24, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:46:15PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> +Mugunthan, Tom
>>
>> On 17 January 2016 at 03:56, Christophe Ricard
>> <christophe.ricard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Convert omap3_spi driver to DM and keep compatibility with previous
>> > mode.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard at st.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  drivers/spi/Kconfig     |   6 +
>> >  drivers/spi/omap3_spi.c | 439 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >  drivers/spi/omap3_spi.h |  14 +-
>> >  3 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>> This is a pretty painful conversion, with lots of #ifdefs. I think it
>> would be possible to use a common pointer type and reduce this.
>>
>> But perhaps it does not matter - how long must we be in the state of
>> supporting legacy SPI? Can we convert all TI boards to driver model?
>
> We _really_ need some way to support more than one board per binary
> before we can move everything to DM only.
>
> I think we can kind of do this today if we stick to using platform data
> for everything that's board-specific rather than SoC-defined.  What we
> talked about at ELCE was auto-generating the pdata from the device tree,
> I think.

We discussed this on IRC but since that doesn't exist as far as the
mailing list is concerned...

The current plan is:

- Adjust build system to optionally build a u-boot.img in FIT format
that includes the U-Boot binary and >1 device tree files
- Adjust SPL to load this
- Add a way for SPL to determine which device tree to select (by
calling a board-specific function)
- Have SPL pass this selected device tree to U-Boot when it starts

Thus we should be able to support more than one board with a single
U-Boot image. Of course this is not a perfect solution (e.g. it is
inefficient since the DTs are likely to be largely the same) but it
should be a good first step.

I'm going to try this out with sunxi initially and plan to get some
patches out by the end of the week.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list