[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] include:configs: Add usb device-tree fixup for all fsl platforms
Ramneek Mehresh
ramneek.mehresh at nxp.com
Wed Jan 27 05:30:51 CET 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 9:57 AM
> To: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh at nxp.com>
> Cc: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh at freescale.com>; u-
> boot at lists.denx.de; Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] include:configs: Add usb device-tree fixup for all fsl
> platforms
>
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 05:14:00 AM, Ramneek Mehresh wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 4:58 PM
> > > To: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh at freescale.com>
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] include:configs: Add usb device-tree fixup for
> > > all fsl platforms
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 12:36:58 PM, Ramneek Mehresh wrote:
> > > > Add usb device-tree fixup for all relevant fsl ppc and arm platforms
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh
> <ramneek.mehresh at freescale.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > board/freescale/b4860qds/b4860qds.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/bsc9131rdb/bsc9131rdb.c | 2 ++
> > > > board/freescale/bsc9132qds/bsc9132qds.c | 2 ++
> > > > board/freescale/corenet_ds/corenet_ds.c | 4 ++++
> > > > board/freescale/ls2080aqds/ls2080aqds.c | 4 ++++
> > > > board/freescale/ls2080ardb/ls2080ardb.c | 4 ++++
> > > > board/freescale/mpc8308rdb/mpc8308rdb.c | 4 ++++
> > > > board/freescale/mpc8315erdb/mpc8315erdb.c | 2 ++
> > > > board/freescale/mpc837xemds/mpc837xemds.c | 2 ++
> > > > board/freescale/mpc837xerdb/mpc837xerdb.c | 2 ++
> > > > board/freescale/mpc8536ds/mpc8536ds.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/p1010rdb/p1010rdb.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/p1022ds/p1022ds.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/p1023rdb/p1023rdb.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/p1_twr/p1_twr.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/p2041rdb/p2041rdb.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/t102xqds/t102xqds.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/t102xrdb/t102xrdb.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/t1040qds/t1040qds.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/t104xrdb/t104xrdb.c | 2 +-
> > > > board/freescale/t208xqds/t208xqds.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/t208xrdb/t208xrdb.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/t4qds/t4240emu.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/t4qds/t4240qds.c | 3 +++
> > > > board/freescale/t4rdb/t4240rdb.c | 3 +++
> > > > include/configs/B4860QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/BSC9131RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/BSC9132QDS.h | 3 ++-
> > > > include/configs/MPC8308RDB.h | 3 +++
> > > > include/configs/MPC8315ERDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h | 3 ++-
> > > > include/configs/MPC837XERDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/MPC8536DS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P1022DS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P1023RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/P2041RDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T102xQDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T102xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T1040QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T104xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T208xQDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T208xRDB.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/T4240QDS.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/corenet_ds.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls2080aqds.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/ls2080ardb.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/p1_p2_rdb_pc.h | 1 +
> > > > include/configs/p1_twr.h | 1 +
> > > > 50 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Each such new macro must be documented. What is the point of this bulk
> > > rename anyway?
> >
> > Yes, I'll document the new MACRO defined for usb device-tree fixup.
> > However, this is not bulk rename. I just modified all these files to
> > include usb device-tree fixup for all fsl ppc platforms. Most of these
> > platforms were already using this mechanism (some via different ways),
> but
> > now its consistent across them.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make this generic then instead of patching
> zillion files ?
The patch set is to make this support generic, but I do need to make these platforms use this generic
support in consistent way via single macro inclusion in their configs...
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list