[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Jan 29 04:06:06 CET 2016
Hi Stephen,
On 25 January 2016 at 17:42, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 01/25/2016 02:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>
>> On 01/25/2016 01:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device
>>> tree.
>>> This is somewhat annoying since you need either u-boot.bin or
>>> u-boot-dtb.bin
>>> depending on whether device tree is used.
>>>
>>> Adjust the build such that u-boot.bin includes a device tree, and the
>>> plain binary is in u-boot-nodtb.bin. For now u-boot-dtb.bin remains the
>>> same.
>>>
>>> This should be acceptable since:
>>>
>>> - without OF_CONTROL, u-boot.bin still does not include a device tree
>>> - with OF_CONTROL, u-boot-dtb.bin does not change
>>>
>>> The main impact is build systems which are set up to use u-boot.bin as
>>> the output file and then add a device tree. These will have to change
>>> to use
>>> u-boot-nodtb.bin instead.
>>
>>
>> That's probably going to annoy somebody. Have you put thought into how
>> such a build system could auto-detect which file it should use in order
>> to automatically adjust to the different file naming conventions of
>> different U-Boot versions or branches? If not, this change will burden
>> the operator of any tool or automated system with manually handling the
>> difference by branching their own code or processes:-(
>>
>>> Adjust tegra rules so it continues to produce the correct files.
>>
>>
>> I don't see anything Tegra-related in this patch. Perhaps patch 1/7 was
>> included here in a previous version and the commit description not
>> updated?
>>
>> Anyway, I think this patch doesn't affect me or Tegra's flashing tools.
>> For reference, the tool currently uses the following files:
>>
>> u-boot
>> spl/u-boot-spl
>> u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin
>> u-boot.dtb
>> u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin
>
>
> Oh, that list is for ARMv7 targets. For ARMv8 targets, we currently use the
> following instead:
>
> u-boot*
> u-boot.bin
> u-boot.dtb
> u-boot-dtb.bin
>
> Preferably those files won't change either, or if they do, there's a trivial
> way of determining which set of files is present (e.g. perhaps we pick up
> u-boot-nodtb.bin and u-boot-dtb.bin if those two files exist, else we pick
> up u-boot.bin and u-boot-dtb.bin?)
The only addition will be u-boot-nodtb.bin. I'm not sure what you
should pick up - perhaps everything?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list