[U-Boot] [PATCH] clk: Correct compilation when OF_CONTROL is not set

[Simon Glass]

Hi Masahiro,

On 20 January 2016 at 20:06, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-01-21 11:41 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>:
> > At present clk.h does not build without OF_CONTROL, but it is clearly
> > intended to. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  include/clk.h | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/clk.h b/include/clk.h
> > index 05c5a79..e6ab934 100644
> > --- a/include/clk.h
> > +++ b/include/clk.h
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >  #ifndef _CLK_H_
> >  #define _CLK_H_
> >
> > +#include <errno.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> >  struct udevice;
> > @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ int fdt_clk_get(const void *fdt, int nodeoffset, int index,
> >                 struct udevice **dev);
> >  #else
> >  static inline int fdt_clk_get(const void *fdt, int nodeoffset, int index,
> > -                             struct udevice **dev);
> > +                             struct udevice **dev)
> >  {
> >         return -ENOSYS;
> >  }
>
>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> But, I assume yours will go in:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/571015/
>
>
> Please just drop mine.

OK I see, they have a similar purpose. Do you have everything you need
to bring up the clock driver you were working on?

Regards,
Simon