[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] nand: extend nand torture
Benoît Thébaudeau
benoit.thebaudeau.dev at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 01:41:38 CEST 2016
Hi Max,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09 at gmail.com> wrote:
> nand torture currently works on exactly one nand block which is specified
> by giving the byteoffset to the beginning of the block.
>
> Extend this by allowing for a second parameter specifying the byte size
> to be tested.
>
> e.g.
> ==> nand torture 1000000
>
> NAND torture: device 0 offset 0x1000000 size 0x20000 (nand block size 0x20000)
> passed 1, failed 0
>
> ==> nand torture 1000000 40000
>
> NAND torture: device 0 offset 0x1000000 size 0x40000 (nand block size 0x20000)
> passed 2, failed 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher at toradex.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - findings from Benoît:
> - change interface to be offset/size
> - change the output to include both 'size tested' and 'nand block size'
> - updated doc/README.nand accordingly
> - I did not implement the suggestion to move the code into the
> nand_torture() function. Likely one uses the extended functionality
> only during HW bringup interactively. If one would want to test
> multiple blocks from code one would also want to know the testresult
> of each individual block rather than only having a return parameter
> indicating a 'all good' or 'at least one block failed'.
>
> cmd/nand.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> doc/README.nand | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmd/nand.c b/cmd/nand.c
> index 583a18f..8ade5e2 100644
> --- a/cmd/nand.c
> +++ b/cmd/nand.c
> @@ -647,6 +647,8 @@ static int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TORTURE
> if (strcmp(cmd, "torture") == 0) {
> + loff_t endoff;
> + unsigned failed = 0, passed = 0;
> if (argc < 3)
> goto usage;
>
> @@ -654,13 +656,28 @@ static int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> puts("Offset is not a valid number\n");
> return 1;
> }
> -
> - printf("\nNAND torture: device %d offset 0x%llx size 0x%x\n",
> - dev, off, mtd->erasesize);
> - ret = nand_torture(mtd, off);
> - printf(" %s\n", ret ? "Failed" : "Passed");
> -
> - return ret == 0 ? 0 : 1;
> + size = mtd->erasesize;
> + if (argc > 3)
> + if (!str2off(argv[3], &size)) {
> + puts("Size is not a valid number\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + printf("\nNAND torture: device %d offset 0x%llx size 0x%llx (nand block size 0x%x)\n",
> + dev, off, size, mtd->erasesize);
> +
> + endoff = off + size;
> + while (off < endoff) {
> + ret = nand_torture(mtd, off);
> + if (ret) {
> + failed++;
> + printf(" off 0x%llx %s\n", off, "Failed");
> + } else {
> + passed++;
> + }
> + off += mtd->erasesize;
> + }
> + printf("passed %u, failed %u\n", passed, failed);
> + return failed == 0 ? 0 : 1;
The given offset could also start anywhere, so it's better to
auto-align it like the size.
If the arguments extend beyond the end of the flash, then
nand_torture() will return an error at each iteration, so it's better
to break the loop or not to start it in this case.
It's better to print the range actually tortured than the arguments
from the user.
So what about the following?
@@ -647,6 +647,9 @@ static int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int
argc, char * const argv[])
#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TORTURE
if (strcmp(cmd, "torture") == 0) {
+ loff_t endoff;
+ unsigned int failed = 0, passed = 0;
+
if (argc < 3)
goto usage;
@@ -655,12 +658,36 @@ static int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
int argc, char * const argv[])
return 1;
}
- printf("\nNAND torture: device %d offset 0x%llx size 0x%x\n",
- dev, off, mtd->erasesize);
- ret = nand_torture(mtd, off);
- printf(" %s\n", ret ? "Failed" : "Passed");
+ size = mtd->erasesize;
+ if (argc > 3 && !str2off(argv[3], &size)) {
+ puts("Size is not a valid number\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
- return ret == 0 ? 0 : 1;
+ endoff = off + size;
+ if (endoff > mtd->size) {
+ puts("Arguments beyond end of NAND\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ off = round_down(off, mtd->erasesize);
+ endoff = round_up(endoff, mtd->erasesize);
+ size = endoff - off;
+ printf("\nNAND torture: device %d offset 0x%llx size 0x%llx "
+ "(block size 0x%x)\n",
+ dev, off, size, mtd->erasesize);
+ while (off < endoff) {
+ ret = nand_torture(mtd, off);
+ if (ret) {
+ failed++;
+ printf(" block at 0x%llx failed\n", off);
+ } else {
+ passed++;
+ }
+ off += mtd->erasesize;
+ }
+ printf(" Passed: %u, failed: %u\n", passed, failed);
+ return failed != 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -775,7 +792,8 @@ static char nand_help_text[] =
> "nand bad - show bad blocks\n"
> "nand dump[.oob] off - dump page\n"
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TORTURE
> - "nand torture off - torture block at offset\n"
> + "nand torture off - torture one block at offset\n"
> + "nand torture off size - torture blocks from off to off+size\n"
> #endif
> "nand scrub [-y] off size | scrub.part partition | scrub.chip\n"
> " really clean NAND erasing bad blocks (UNSAFE)\n"
> diff --git a/doc/README.nand b/doc/README.nand
> index 96ffc48..5136f31 100644
> --- a/doc/README.nand
> +++ b/doc/README.nand
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ Miscellaneous and testing commands:
> DANGEROUS!!! Factory set bad blocks will be lost. Use only
> to remove artificial bad blocks created with the "markbad" command.
>
> - "torture offset"
> + "torture offset [size]"
> Torture block to determine if it is still reliable.
> Enabled by the CONFIG_CMD_NAND_TORTURE configuration option.
> This command returns 0 if the block is still reliable, else 1.
> @@ -324,6 +324,10 @@ Miscellaneous and testing commands:
> automate actions following a nand->write() error. This would e.g. be required
> in order to program or update safely firmware to NAND, especially for the UBI
> part of such firmware.
> + Optionally a second parameter size can be given to test multiple blocks with
"Optionally,"
> + one call. If size is not a multiple of the NAND's erasesize then the block
"erase size, then"
> + which contains offset + size will be tested in full. If used with size this
"that", not "which".
"size, this"
> + command returns 0 if all tested blocks have been found reliable, else 1.
>
>
> NAND locking command (for chips with active LOCKPRE pin)
> --
> 2.5.5
>
Best regards,
Benoît
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list